From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50256: thing-at-mouse Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2021 21:58:47 +0300 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <87mtosjgzk.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <87sfys6ubm.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <7c9cb0a1-b222-cb06-7e7c-7f17231faca3@gmx.at> <83pmtsp4g1.fsf@gnu.org> <831r67ph8d.fsf@gnu.org> <87tuj3bffb.fsf@gnus.org> <83y28fo1xf.fsf@gnu.org> <191e9cc6-7370-5b7d-7777-716b61e0155d@gmx.at> <83pmtrnydh.fsf@gnu.org> <158a8854-f56a-9aaa-3a14-d108e086a24c@gmx.at> <83k0jznms2.fsf@gnu.org> <87v93j9dfz.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87y28e4ysv.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83czpqzupp.fsf@gnu.org> <83v93hyl3l.fsf@gnu.org> <83sfykwyyb.fsf@gnu.org> <087851c3-b3b1-5130-f4b1-50cd42ef83a8@gmx.at> <83ilzgwp2w.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27442"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 50256@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 04 21:12:24 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mMb5U-00070q-P4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2021 21:12:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52814 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMb5S-0000TJ-SG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2021 15:12:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44304) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMb4A-0007aK-SR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2021 15:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37062) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMb4A-0005E4-K5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2021 15:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mMb4A-000562-D3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2021 15:11:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2021 19:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50256 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 50256-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50256.163078264319559 (code B ref 50256); Sat, 04 Sep 2021 19:11:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50256) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2021 19:10:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48607 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mMb3r-00055P-G2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2021 15:10:43 -0400 Original-Received: from relay11.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.231]:48317) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mMb3q-000550-Bz for 50256@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2021 15:10:42 -0400 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by relay11.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 28048100003; Sat, 4 Sep 2021 19:10:34 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <83ilzgwp2w.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 04 Sep 2021 14:35:35 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:213434 Archived-At: >> Maybe I have not been making myself clear. What I would apply is the >> attached (modulo any errors it contains): No change in behavior, just a >> warning in the doc-string and suspicious calls. > > That doesn't fix the problem which started this thread, does it? Indeed, it displays a warning, but doesn't fix the problem.