From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22238: 25.0.50; isearch symbol search can't find ,@symbol Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2023 04:21:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87mszfjw48.fsf@web.de> References: <87io3mtdxw.fsf@web.de> <87fs58bzom.fsf@web.de> <874jloh363.fsf@epfl.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33846"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: contovob@tcd.ie To: 22238@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 29 04:37:35 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qPZpn-0008ej-Hm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 29 Jul 2023 04:37:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qPZan-0004xI-Jg; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 22:22:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qPZak-0004w9-Sw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 22:22:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qPZak-0006Kh-Kk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 22:22:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qPZak-0000vZ-Ge for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 22:22:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2023 02:22:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22238 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-Debbugs-Original-To: "Basil L. Contovounesios" via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: "Basil L. Contovounesios" , 22238@debbugs.gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by 22238-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22238.16905972993512 (code B ref 22238); Sat, 29 Jul 2023 02:22:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22238) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jul 2023 02:21:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46325 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qPZaM-0000ua-Kx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 22:21:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.14]:54241) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qPZaK-0000uJ-3H for 22238@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 22:21:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=s29768273; t=1690597289; x=1691202089; i=michael_heerdegen@web.de; bh=Q0FF4d6NKMBR9yzsrc+iPKnk9SjphIeOV6poazLGFcs=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=SQyu8Q+MXmVMnYhZBz/RfSbUvkOVwT7sFLd3b/VY1rZ9VPs8DShsC0r/OPrftXtjs2A107M UwkjSgmAmbD+cToSNNVeQGdu1Qzm/N3y9OiGlywLe53OIHCXpCSXk7LzagKL+eohMJ/i3dBIa uDiZSPZciNJheTWGx7V80/7xn4rv/PYUFLKQMz2iGi0wxva4sAIgQ4xrv/Ds+B2DI3BzPyjMg VWSy7rfvYUWd9SjQGbUBCVyUuDAW4+Gam41XMul1dunhWU3p5Tt1cHrmyUWiD0A0lO6Cqp7Li oD5+Mb4MNMs2nGt3cLIN4wlsfJl5FZ9wq+4JKlQLw0NHinEMSGNw== X-UI-Sender-Class: 814a7b36-bfc1-4dae-8640-3722d8ec6cd6 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([92.75.138.214]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb006 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1Mtguh-1palqZ3zf5-00v1X5; Sat, 29 Jul 2023 04:21:29 +0200 In-Reply-To: <874jloh363.fsf@epfl.ch> (Basil L. Contovounesios's message of "Fri, 28 Jul 2023 10:05:08 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Ccv+fy1fXo96PfdYpEeCnyi7IG8jJxs1Sht+0dYIUroZW1aGmjf EcLK7RkOnlIgnXWeAK03owb4WBuJT7eqZCAzlhWv4PCICujkuQCc2BiijDLpemzYb28DKN9 AJTpBwAxV0WKXeO9WcygZFnMVZgg1FvDQUCeE4UvHFtPyOBOqN05Fax9OplOEBEnPwY8/ek N8EtOueM8TVk5B9y7jjlw== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:9eu5qDNwUPc=;M2FP++SugM+26rDcLZ9yTVOJKNf b0FHh7Gzj1I42K2lb4kNbjSfwPe0Evilsd8ExT4eCW0vJk6I3fLv+eyjmD0BSMnTzyfA4v1CV dU1UVTGusHCdNcpCNytacgd/2+3LhFMD7lJhjalqeqgdYUPyfV0T8WnFz6DunzFl81Tf9UeSd IhCS+KHA5igddgG3i1N8+bZEO3xoWH2uo64N4S4xRJ7YyU10oxAA4sO8wgIDaDk/puBqtSutN RsIZJGObYPPBzBX4PaR9F/yHvj4KYHgfklPOdgyeW0tk9HQCtDs8Q8SDSCaiBnzOO8afp+fc6 GrzXVUoUBFpL4AYmCvBHuHy4sYUYedFHvRg418K8VsNTnh2A7UJfn8OnwIAH4NbOf0fBDwGcn uPQgLeEv0UJHbRCFGA5eD+rFvpA9y+4CtOn7l86G6GgRfNGkbtr8VZmvSStFCV/TGWAMZBJPm q9vb2wbUPtgN4QemWMPhJL2dLNjshJZQmt46mTkcVCdXl4cmV2md0zrSf3wgF17gnQqU8asXu 2NIFq/BPYHj/NNT/3g80HpPexq6Vw4wKO4AWkpNvLev0gF6zWYpqWElfRLMDviycuuxXYHFsL NJaUILAEslUlzukcJCwvJjGn3n1IwkztEbYRsQMljZjFj4gocAdWNn8MmehzNcMX2ENKuDc+e qg3Y8Ml39gLtyczTTq4D/2b0fRB3ewc3vBqBeOD6/U5edHtZAXBFWnlUwamkbsQ1NxZMbG4ty n6fkhEJWLJScPU0+ZbzvLOGGjBdFV7JJ+OeXi6FgkgN421MZ1fgaDk89yfkoi415oYmjlSBC X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:266311 Archived-At: "Basil L. Contovounesios" via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" writes: > > Checking this again and: this seems to be fixed. Closing. > > Ah, I didn't find this report before submitting the duplicate > https://bugs.gnu.org/44418 (although I claimed to find the behaviour > in Emacs 24.5 as well). Oh, and I didn't find the other report although I was sure that I had read some discussion about this issue during vacations (if I only had known about the secret pattern...). Thanks for joining. > Let's see if merging works without the need for excessive force... The result looks ok to me. Thx, Michael.