From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14192: 24.3.50; recursive edit while running ispell not working usefully Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 04:13:50 +0100 Message-ID: <87mstc5zpt.fsf@web.de> References: <87hajbkd3v.fsf@web.de> <87ppxzd75p.fsf@web.de> Reply-To: Michael Heerdegen Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9245"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 14192@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 11 04:14:30 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rNlWY-0002E6-FG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 04:14:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNlW8-0000UC-Vz; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 22:14:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNlW8-0000U4-4i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 22:14:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNlW7-0002zd-Sv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 22:14:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rNlW6-0007Pj-Ed for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 22:14:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 03:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14192 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 14192-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14192.170494281628450 (code B ref 14192); Thu, 11 Jan 2024 03:14:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14192) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jan 2024 03:13:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43635 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rNlVf-0007Oo-OE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 22:13:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.12]:34045) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rNlVd-0007Ob-Kj for 14192@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 22:13:34 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=s29768273; t=1704942807; x=1705547607; i=michael_heerdegen@web.de; bh=D5hFYBeNXVGFRmh76WZnRT2kRj0mKaDAKqrTETF0E2s=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Date; b=FuYO0e5zyhwhW5NTaFfKnja+X+Op1bPKHK6HzqGpRQOdFYEtfX0G6Fku24XiEy4H Lew+ePpMQE5nhF7l/zWooIwe52ST9wgwE45sifvUJjxSBYDuUih6iQEkcuhJQkRcg KXMaZoalHMZtI7lXMElhK+l8ScN5khPcP6QkGEuvxL/Bqk1VywZre8EI6nKRfe6M8 yLALoTySbmxNBPaS9rHh4QCYAOgmmIB6R3ah0bT6MlxrlZqkg9Snunj+bRCfIVBIn d8j+tjP0H9TbNmLNIbcueyNJeoMDVWqhkbCM9HS9EjkejTTNsiZuiJI5WnuZEPXfV lE9MlbNKVRs27QhJYA== X-UI-Sender-Class: 814a7b36-bfc1-4dae-8640-3722d8ec6cd6 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([84.59.210.83]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb105 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MVaYw-1rn1bH2LH2-00RwJZ; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 04:13:27 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Wed, 10 Jan 2024 03:19:11 -0800") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:9YYziCVQLSg/PZdKToezwm16CBBdC1oGywQBMkJ03teKrU6z880 p95tPAXOIdxCr2T5ZyFyj0FVNABSt5iFJuLfJvriV4d0xks8Fgs1XCgLYBECn5AzzwscHIF yufHfa6+r9UQgY8RY99im1O1i2XVgqQdibNXCJ/o+GDp/F0MzqI09druOWUGzlNTWv4jpM5 oG6r1UFwLR4Q2hBb73r8g== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:jf6NE//1OGE=;FU3A1/AbX4SkFvwY7d9trIYrh/b woVhygMC1H/hmKL/GUcf0Kkxh6GuiHDVFD4CC9jZOz00n3jyjZ2KsGWiPo4zJusdJqS/S3bZT xkSoTvaxGMt1JwDYRyBpNOZyz2gnPAHswsccehCviWOSae5ksKUV1GYnxiKqoszv1+Q61pjrH ckHtGMbfuuykbX+gCpjUdc2W6dCXVb1drM8gYUUsFJLtjiDV4iA0pAdedP75WNtroIAAJ/Hmj DMZv5y4Imo/FJjUS39DnIip9mCAhPIem1+SoxCOMwM0wPAcX4QHooL5T4D7shdtjrrF9Wx2qD LkRSIrtiPeG42fMqB2OzC8ghZndbrTY9tOUJNDzkLwLPCGFtkm5PNTuu5aXxJ24NqqaFemwSE Ris8TC8qfvOd3lSCp65QdTtPzlymcDhgLbt0fJFLFNPwPC7CA6Miunb372oesDe7t2s0aBBs0 g/wegkAUVrcGtbavJmsbBC7TBx326RFrrG/H3WJ4Xylr78paJNKweKSqAWf5yGbxPr1mQFSaN pa3EPhwik7kU3KI5OuwcxSZCq5oUwcVURGgTY8CLnqTivX2+yIICg84pzOCV7WdHvpakE0cqt HGT2WdYNMDyDJPAsO25GLlGyRFems55juFKo3bUhq8x+ooEmZKvP8NdSBpDd6aMElvkYSnx2n Y+Lfv8Uh4rZaPzYVus7K6FcADfgkv+qd91fhDqUduk3DkcS5RF7uamKj2Abd2l7M0YM/6OHUT ROLcX18ka37CETk2BPt+9X0sYR1/U9IiD7/lEmnsaEFVoXmjykgqgj3S7q+Nl86bxrcVV5du X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:277858 Archived-At: Stefan Kangas writes: > That was 10 years ago, so I'm reaching out to see if this is still > an issue on a modern version of Emacs. AFAIK, nothing has changed in the behavior since then. I guess the authors did not intend the recursive edit to be used to change the buffer text. But if somebody uses it to change the buffer text, Emacs will happily mess it up. > If I don't hear back from you within a couple of months, Ill just assume > that this has been fixed and close this bug. I hope this is not your standard reply. I mean, ten years, I could have died in the meantime, which would not mean that the bug has magically disappeared. I hope you send this kind of text only to people you know that are still using Emacs regularly. Because, if some user asks a question, gets no answer, then makes a bug report, and is ignored for ten years, it is very unfriendly to request anything at all. I know about the situation of our bug collection, but this is not expedient. You can't expect anyone to even still use Emacs after a whole decade. Michael.