From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
To: Ship Mints <shipmints@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Mendler <mail@daniel-mendler.de>, 74604@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#74604: 30.0.92; FR: M-x package-upgrade - offer an option to show a diff on upgrade
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2024 12:18:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87msheqnwh.fsf@posteo.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAN+1HbqOavhsd3xtN4XN6LyPyW5k=fvP0TE0pNGG9viW289hJQ@mail.gmail.com> (Ship Mints's message of "Mon, 2 Dec 2024 07:04:24 -0500")
Ship Mints <shipmints@gmail.com> writes:
> Isn't it the case that describe-package works only on installed packages,
> not prospectively installed packages? To help determine the value/risk of a
> package install or update, I'd think it better to show this in advance.
> Daniel's diff suggestion is similar but more technical.
describe-package (C-h p) works on all packages, but the news feature I
described wouldn't work as it uses a local file. But that is not a
hard-constraint, we could serve news data as well.
I don't know how much sense it makes to present a diff when installing a
package. News files are probably also not that interesting. We could
provide a command like package-vc-checkout that just fetches the package
source and places it somewhere for the user to inspect.
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 3:59 AM Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> wrote:
>
>> Ship Mints <shipmints@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > I like this idea, too. I spend a reasonable amount of time trying to
>> > understand what people have changed and if it will affect me negatively
>> > (the defensive part) or positively (for new features, user options,
>> > deprecations). Showing a source-code diff may be a bit technical for some
>> > users, though. I wonder if there could be either a link to a changelog,
>> or
>> > a way to encourage a changelog convention so one could be displayed for
>> > users prior to a decision to update a package.
>>
>> Note that packages can distribute this information. Currently, if a
>> tarball includes a "news" file, it will be displayed by
>> `describe-package. IIRC no package archive generates these right now.
>> But if we implement a user option like that described above (or below?),
>> then we can add that as an option as well.
>>
>> The main issue is that not all package maintainers ensure that there are
>> changelog/news sources that ELPA could use to provide this information.
>>
>> > -Stephane
>> >
>> > On Sun, Dec 1, 2024 at 5:06 PM Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Daniel Mendler <mail@daniel-mendler.de> writes:
>> >>
>> >> > This is a feature request for the security wishlist. When upgrading
>> >> > package it would be good to show a diff between the new and old
>> package
>> >> > files. Such an option could help performing review casually as part of
>> >> > the upgrade process and may improve the security of the package
>> >> > archives. More eyes would look at new package versions. This would
>> make
>> >> > it harder to inject malicious code either via the source repository or
>> >> > via attacks on the package archives.
>> >>
>> >> That sounds like a good option to have! I'll look into adding something
>> >> like this via a user option that adjusts how to confirm a package
>> upgrade.
>> >>
>> >> Note that package-vc has something similar with the
>> >> `package-vc-log-incoming' command.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-02 12:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-29 15:39 bug#74604: 30.0.92; FR: M-x package-upgrade - offer an option to show a diff on upgrade Daniel Mendler via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-12-01 22:05 ` Philip Kaludercic
2024-12-01 22:47 ` Ship Mints
2024-12-02 8:59 ` Philip Kaludercic
2024-12-02 12:04 ` Ship Mints
2024-12-02 12:18 ` Philip Kaludercic [this message]
2024-12-02 12:25 ` Daniel Mendler via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-12-01 23:12 ` Daniel Mendler via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87msheqnwh.fsf@posteo.net \
--to=philipk@posteo.net \
--cc=74604@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=mail@daniel-mendler.de \
--cc=shipmints@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).