From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#994: Processed: severity 994 wishlist Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:59:14 -0400 Message-ID: <87ljxa1jil.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> References: <87k5culgm2.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <001101c9228c$728367b0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> Reply-To: Chong Yidong , 994@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1222740612 21913 80.91.229.12 (30 Sep 2008 02:10:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 02:10:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 1055-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, 994@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, 'Emacs bug Tracking System' To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 30 04:11:10 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KkUhh-0000ea-5E for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Sep 2008 04:11:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50998 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KkUge-0002k1-7k for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:10:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KkUga-0002jt-CH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:10:00 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KkUgZ-0002jN-D8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:09:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42775 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KkUgZ-0002jE-5E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:09:59 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:49348) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KkUgY-0000Fd-FH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:09:58 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m8U29tot021514; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:09:55 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m8U2554n020396; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:05:05 -0700 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Chong Yidong Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 02:05:05 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 994 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 994-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B994.122273990718360 (code B ref 994); Tue, 30 Sep 2008 02:05:05 +0000 Original-Received: (at 994) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 30 Sep 2008 01:58:27 +0000 Original-Received: from cyd.mit.edu (CYD.MIT.EDU [18.115.2.24]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m8U1wI4u018353; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:58:19 -0700 Original-Received: by cyd.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 50C6257E341; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:59:14 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <001101c9228c$728367b0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:38:16 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:09:59 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:20885 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: > Why is this fodder for the wishlist? This bug is a regression! > > Stefan asked for a recipe to reproduce it, so no doubt this behavior is not > intentional (not a design change). It is bad, bugged behavior, and it is new. > > Why on earth would such a bug report be classified as "wish list"? Perhaps you > are simply wishing bugs away? ;-) Please don't make a separate CC to bug-gnu-emacs; that creates a new bug entry. Just reply to NNN@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com. The bug in question is not a regression, unless you have a rather broad definition of "regression". It is neither obviously buggy nor new, so I'd prefer it if people work on the other outstanding issues first. But if it bugs you that much... patch welcome. I don't want to waste time debating bug classification.