From: <osv@javad.com>
To: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp>
Cc: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>, 5679@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#5679: Emacs 23.1.93 pretest
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:29:59 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lje0h0so.fsf@osv.gnss.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <wlmxygo23r.wl%mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp> (YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu's message of "Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:19:52 +0900")
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp> writes:
>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:05:07 +0300, <osv@javad.com> said:
>
>>> I tried installing the PCF fonts extracted from
>>> xfonts-terminus-oblique_4.26-2.1_all.deb to ~/.fonts on Mac OS X
>>> 10.6. The result was:
>>>
>>> 1. I could reproduce the above problem on Emacs 23.1.92.
>>> 2. But I could also reproduce it on Emacs 23.1, unlike OP.
>
>> No, I, the OP, can also reproduce it on Emacs 23.1. Here is what I
>> wrote in the original report:
>
>> " Small example screenshots from emacs 22.2.1 (correct rendering)
>> and emacs 23.1.93 (wrong rendering) are attached. Please notice how
>> ugly "Global Mark Ring" looks when rendered by emacs23.
>
>> NOTE: emacs 23.1.1 also renders wrong."
>
> I meant this one:
>
>>>>>> On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 22:22:50 +0300, <osv@javad.com> said:
>
>> BTW, emacs 23.1.1 only breaks rendering after I move cursor over the
>> text. If I, for examle, select the text (active region so it's
>> highlighted), the rendering becomes OK. Emacs 23.1.93 is more
>> consistent and always renders bad.
>
> I could not find the difference between the release version and the
> pretest one.
Well, I do see this difference indeed, but both render wrong anyway, so
the difference is not essential, I think.
> Anyway, is `xterm -fa terminus:style=oblique' also broken? If so, we
> can conclude this is not a bug at the Emacs side.
Yeah, this is broken as well. So please excuse my ignorance, but where
exactly the problem is? I.e., why emacs 22 renders it fine? What is a
work-around for emacs 23?
-- Sergei.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-10 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <87pr3rny7e.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
2010-03-04 14:36 ` bug#5679: Emacs 23.1.93 pretest Sergei Organov
2010-03-04 15:57 ` Chong Yidong
2010-03-04 17:43 ` osv
2010-03-04 18:06 ` Chong Yidong
2010-03-04 19:22 ` osv
2010-03-09 0:05 ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2010-03-09 9:57 ` osv
2010-03-09 11:30 ` osv
2010-03-10 11:19 ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2010-03-10 11:29 ` osv [this message]
2010-03-10 11:54 ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2010-03-10 12:12 ` osv
2010-03-11 0:38 ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2010-03-10 6:23 ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2010-03-10 10:05 ` osv
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lje0h0so.fsf@osv.gnss.ru \
--to=osv@javad.com \
--cc=5679@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=cyd@stupidchicken.com \
--cc=mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).