From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6810: 23.2; dired-omit-mode makes dired slow Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 14:55:36 -0500 Message-ID: <87lj42k75z.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87d3phxjtb.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1291666553 27670 80.91.229.12 (6 Dec 2010 20:15:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 20:15:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6810@debbugs.gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 06 21:15:49 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PPhTQ-0006F1-V5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 21:15:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34567 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PPhTQ-0007Fl-AG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:15:48 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51014 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PPhTF-0007DW-UD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:15:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PPhTE-0001gX-WD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:15:37 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53683) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PPhTE-0001gR-Ui for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:15:36 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PPh4V-0002wP-Av; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 14:50:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 19:50:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6810 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6810-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6810.129166498611277 (code B ref 6810); Mon, 06 Dec 2010 19:50:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6810) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Dec 2010 19:49:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PPh4E-0002vm-Ba for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 14:49:46 -0500 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-04.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.145]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PPh4C-0002vW-Ae for 6810@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 14:49:44 -0500 Original-Received: from furball (dhcp128036014234.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.234]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-04.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB6JtaQt017995 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 6 Dec 2010 14:55:37 -0500 Original-Received: by furball (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E3929160C98; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 14:55:36 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Sun, 05 Dec 2010 05:20:07 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.145 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 14:50:03 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:42222 Archived-At: Leo writes: > On 2010-12-04 22:19 +0000, Chong Yidong wrote: >> Shouldn't this handle dired-before-readin hook too? > > I think at the time of running dired-map-over-marks, dired already > passed before-readin stage. So it is. I've committed your fix, thanks.