From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9621: 24.0.90; a characger not displayed Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 22:09:57 +0800 Message-ID: <87lit74eyy.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20110927.155802.49633926.Takaaki.Ota@am.sony.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1317305484 29376 80.91.229.12 (29 Sep 2011 14:11:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:11:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9621@debbugs.gnu.org, William Xu To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 29 16:11:20 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R9HKX-0003AU-4G for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:11:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48391 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9HKW-0004Kg-Dk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:11:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45788) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9HKN-0004KN-CB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:11:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9HKI-0000Nt-4s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:11:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52408) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9HKI-0000Np-1t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R9HLG-0006yG-I6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:12:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jason Rumney Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9621 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9621-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9621.131730547826745 (code B ref 9621); Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9621) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Sep 2011 14:11:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R9HKX-0006xJ-Ec for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:11:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yw0-f44.google.com ([209.85.213.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R9HKR-0006x7-Ir for 9621@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:11:14 -0400 Original-Received: by ywa6 with SMTP id 6so568241ywa.3 for <9621@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 07:10:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=M3I/cjiNsGtnYDtborC4CX0MMs4ecbsr4Ms+11SBDY4=; b=dzy8SQQcAj+567EISer/aBH/3rxzl4PJqsk6V+XIGpfwtA1VeZAmfJyhoLNxMJvSYc qvLwHp6ntr5BonlIdGLrIN/9/80a9D40GCMc/F3jGFMYOr0D6t1BlvAJwMiK2b5AYEUi l0754OWzuRCFdf6Q9t+mzCC7R7VlWj56I6l40= Original-Received: by 10.68.17.201 with SMTP id q9mr50994341pbd.15.1317305409754; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 07:10:09 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from home.jasonrumney.net ([180.75.253.195]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h5sm6979320pbf.4.2011.09.29.07.10.03 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 29 Sep 2011 07:10:06 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by home.jasonrumney.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CB3D714CF; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 22:09:57 +0800 (MYT) In-Reply-To: (Kenichi Handa's message of "Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:01:02 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:12:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:51980 Archived-At: Kenichi Handa writes: > In article <21glmxdouaq6.fsf@gmail.com>, William Xu > writes: > >> The real problem is that when the selected font(like BatangChe here) >> doesn't contain all the glyphs for the unicode range it covers, emacs >> doesn't select a fallback font, like Arial Unicode MS here. > > Really? I remember that I wrote a code to search for > another font in such a case. It looks to me that the code that is trying to search for another font is using the next font regexp in the list for the script, rather than the next font that was returned in the previous list. As you can see from the log, all the regexps for kana are returning either the same list of fonts, or an empty list. So the result of this searching is that the BatangChe font gets tried over and over again.