From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ivan Kanis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9158: 24.0.50; Regression in e-mail heade completion Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 11:05:06 +0100 Message-ID: <87lirxo71p.fsf@kanis.fr> References: <87fwlxgcwq.fsf@kanis.fr> <87wrdt4txa.fsf@kanis.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1320314750 5945 80.91.229.12 (3 Nov 2011 10:05:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 10:05:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9158@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 03 11:05:45 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RLuB6-00056z-00 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 11:05:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60937 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLuB5-0003ji-Gy for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 06:05:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50914) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLuB2-0003jd-Hu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 06:05:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLuAw-00016q-N1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 06:05:40 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44321) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLuAw-00016c-Jm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 06:05:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RLuDJ-0003J7-T9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 06:08:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ivan Kanis Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 10:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9158 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 9158-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9158.132031486212689 (code B ref 9158); Thu, 03 Nov 2011 10:08:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9158) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Nov 2011 10:07:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RLuD0-0003Ib-5z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 06:07:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com ([209.85.214.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RLuCy-0003IQ-22 for 9158@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 06:07:41 -0400 Original-Received: by bkbzv15 with SMTP id zv15so502032bkb.3 for <9158@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 03:05:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:face:x-hashcash:x-hashcash:x-hashcash :date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=IOW4jj3V4tezt61kIH4OXx/EQJCLSY2l/9i7wDzhymI=; b=Dnqhafme/HyPQr/V+/RbVZue3lEjS69p+cyvRooDRmVlqCiovexACRBghKuG4Yxv4D 3/W+ih75tX7Ao8Lp9W7cx20dar+YG0bktKdpmSzsD1YolDmn7xImbZcmzbVGevcnm4LS ae90hy76qN3KdCeE1xL8K6LQ+I1VyK+Mphdo0= Original-Received: by 10.204.14.208 with SMTP id h16mr7602709bka.2.1320314711316; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 03:05:11 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from tao ([89.83.137.164]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o8sm392352bkd.3.2011.11.03.03.05.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 03 Nov 2011 03:05:10 -0700 (PDT) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAAXNSR0IArs4c6QAAAB5QTFRF IBkXUxMTOCwoTC4qcUY8iFxQmmper31txpaJ/v/8aKZ1oAAAAcVJREFUOMt100tu2zAQAFDCXnUZ oAcIqG68LZULVLQBbwuSiffm6AIRRyeotAySJoVu2+FPpJWWC3/4NKOZocSW/yxWfnJ2+Bdwzhj7 8gleWVy7DXC2rkMNr2V/zRbghXIwthf3VbIA9Ffc71vZCSFyCEsBggtNS8ludwvfmhYA0Vn9o4DP zMWxR7+cPWzAYFzwM0ModtdmcDbDS6i/hT7L+RZof5yCXGrYe5jn2YO6BYMjgY+51tCIAqHgBLwR pwLnGuRjAKyBJkuN4yd4U92uCY1vUr2D/c5b8DuxyQwfOHUeaLqDJhnkkuGXbB56h2C1IVBdgncc bBi6feroa9B6jUDojnQPQKupbyXyeeCE1oT7Oqrt+SnfY3mkiyGA/3AmD3H5g32CcBx6hY8pRkwJ 9PpcjRGobUfprFnhAa1vepwcgMOhwG+pdSgKHFU9HAvoAH6XUl7lDUCCq5Qb6GMbVm3Aj++qDYCt wdBc/YHgOFCmS3mjDMRcSE2qY4E3Q3PVIQRQmeodNH4QEbRUFZzW+VotzwX4yTcRTySOML1qjcE5 hTirVqDHkMAP0PjAywp3d18JZtqzvr9zDYD+GaSKtE6Zlr/DLPNFmOcvBAAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Hashcash: 1:20:111103:ivan.kanis@googlemail.com::WSB2LRoZPKUJv5I7:0000000000000000000000000000000000001RhH X-Hashcash: 1:20:111103:monnier@iro.umontreal.ca::W6H3Sk8Z57w2xT/o:00000000000000000000000000000000000002JLo X-Hashcash: 1:20:111103:9158@debbugs.gnu.org::x76nShhe36rdY/uG:000000000000000000000000000000000000000004TTv In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri, 21 Oct 2011 18:57:04 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.91 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 06:08:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:53464 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: >>>> I get the message "completion for "foo" unfound" which is fine. The bug >>>> is that the cursor moves forward several spaces. Apparently >>>> indent-relative gets called when it shouldn't. >>>> I expected the cursor to remain at the end of the entry that did not >>>> match. It worked fine on 23.3. >>> The way the new code works can't handle this correctly because the BBDB >>> code doesn't indicate that something happened: it just always returns nil >>> whether something was done or not. >>> The new BBDB-3 has fixed this, AFAIK, so you may want to try that out. >> I have just installed bbdb 3. It doesn't fix it. I'll reopen the bug >> because it's a regression. > > After looking into it some more, I realized that it's actually behaving > as designed, but not as documented in the docstring. I see you've commited the patch in bzr. It works, thanks! -- Ivan Kanis http://kanis.fr What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly. It is dearness only that gives everything its value. -- Thomas Paine