From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10838: 24.0.92; package.el shows a misleading version number Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 17:45:25 +0800 Message-ID: <87linghf7u.fsf@gnu.org> References: <877gzb7bov.fsf@gnu.org> <87ehtcjmfc.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1330854420 24786 80.91.229.3 (4 Mar 2012 09:47:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 09:47:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10838@debbugs.gnu.org, Phil Hagelberg To: Tom Tromey Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 04 10:46:58 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S481p-0005TY-Ty for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 10:46:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36797 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S481p-0005Dn-Ax for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 04:46:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44166) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S481m-0005DX-8I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 04:46:55 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S481k-0003WS-BU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 04:46:53 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53779) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S481k-0003WL-7P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 04:46:52 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S481u-0000gq-D7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 04:47:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 09:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10838 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10838-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10838.13308544002615 (code B ref 10838); Sun, 04 Mar 2012 09:47:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10838) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Mar 2012 09:46:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60608 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S481X-0000fn-Iz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 04:46:40 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:41084) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S481C-0000fF-6l for 10838@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 04:46:28 -0500 Original-Received: from bb116-14-103-36.singnet.com.sg ([116.14.103.36]:53740 helo=furball) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S480T-0004eC-MD; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 04:45:34 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87ehtcjmfc.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Thu, 01 Mar 2012 09:49:59 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:57482 Archived-At: Tom Tromey writes: > Chong> IMO, it's desireable for the package.el in Emacs to retain a version > Chong> number header, just in case there is any package that in turn relies on > Chong> package.el (even though sounds pretty theoretical). I propose bumping > Chong> the package.el in Emacs to 1.0. Any objection? > > It is fine by me. Done.