From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13649: boobytrapped dired-do-async-shell-command question Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 10:25:01 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <87liazyzz6.fsf@mail.jurta.org> References: <871ucsjdl1.fsf@jidanni.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1360311966 2489 80.91.229.3 (8 Feb 2013 08:26:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 08:26:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13649@debbugs.gnu.org To: jidanni@jidanni.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 08 09:26:25 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U3jHs-0001sv-L7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 09:26:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34508 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3jHZ-0004fT-P1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 03:26:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60547) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3jHW-0004ZD-Ed for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 03:26:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3jHU-00042v-Lk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 03:26:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37372) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3jHU-00042r-Ip for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 03:26:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U3jHW-00049z-82 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 03:26:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 08:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13649 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13649-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13649.136031195615980 (code B ref 13649); Fri, 08 Feb 2013 08:26:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13649) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2013 08:25:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42836 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U3jHP-00049g-Ft for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 03:25:55 -0500 Original-Received: from ps18281.dreamhost.com ([69.163.218.105]:58574 helo=ps18281.dreamhostps.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U3jHM-00049W-Ic for 13649@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 03:25:53 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (ps18281.dreamhostps.com [69.163.218.105]) by ps18281.dreamhostps.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 931B1201AFC00C; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 00:25:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <871ucsjdl1.fsf@jidanni.org> (jidanni@jidanni.org's message of "Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:25:30 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:70874 Archived-At: > A command is running in the default buffer. Use a new buffer? (yes or no) > > Which is a boobytrapped question, as picking "no" will always end up in failure... Ah, to you "no" means "don't use a new buffer"? Yes, this is too ambiguous. A better question would be: A command is running in the default buffer. Run in a new buffer? (yes or no) 77 characters long, but I have no idea how to make it shorter without much loss of meaning.