From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14804: Gnus spelling fix: unexist -> nonexistent Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:42:30 -0400 Organization: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BE=D1=80_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=97=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87li5fvohl.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <51D7E64E.40601@cs.ucla.edu> <87d2qvzomv.fsf@building.gnus.org> <51D8977B.2060009@cs.ucla.edu> <51DB74FD.1090507@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1373377392 29870 80.91.229.3 (9 Jul 2013 13:43:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 13:43:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , 14804@debbugs.gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 09 15:43:13 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UwYCE-0005LC-Ll for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 15:43:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42733 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UwYCE-0006Vb-8r for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:43:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52051) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UwYC9-0006TP-QE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:43:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UwYC6-0005S3-R7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:43:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:47602) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UwYC6-0005Rq-Gv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:43:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UwYC6-00074r-5a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:43:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ted Zlatanov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:43:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14804 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 14804-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14804.137337736327112 (code B ref 14804); Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:43:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14804) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jul 2013 13:42:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41918 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UwYBm-00073D-Ah for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:42:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com ([209.85.212.54]:48373) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UwYBj-00072V-L0 for 14804@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:42:40 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-vb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id q12so4424667vbe.27 for <14804@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 06:42:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lifelogs.com; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:x-face:mail-copies-to :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=PSt8RhULQjW8GSz+JW8rz3M4qFb95kRqg5JP6rmBkv8=; b=EISY5osIEjmT6H/mHz0Dm9/g6WoN3qPYp3WCZSKFsw/YO84i8siXYme3D1oJTjtgjT A/uOxmEbtGI+9q/ZpfZOk6mwAZprImjhtAAujZtJeXfthQGfvy6oEagt0a1o2X3F2wWn +XfOQo4CIkbn7LmzWRclRxRI3xv88vFMZtKQ0= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:x-face:mail-copies-to :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=PSt8RhULQjW8GSz+JW8rz3M4qFb95kRqg5JP6rmBkv8=; b=oBEk+ag+dImmd/yQtWrujwpmzqA9fkV79hByCK68xuvaqLtP6NzeHwnCBQYBlKLz3z 8xMjI2IJjYAziAbwMN39+xoP/MVEuqkUxnfavHMY0fx0hZHDi7mf7LBo6EcxODQeMrkd sFMvIDc6FdfwfxeLibNKDPxouqrrTIrbo3YOgAj4TSyzLwQES0TZCfnU6D6cKeALNa1N bnAQkLhacRxr1IDcSwL34Q0KJfpZc3JGlB1ez8TTyF6HZTQ3ErE0GPZdU+sowfeVV8AT HR8DidbJKOh6l6EpdFi+0RW7jKBnmYBsTaccb6WadnNu1UbHbfRgNCiRLdOX1WidpU7y dwpg== X-Received: by 10.52.27.232 with SMTP id w8mr13666345vdg.111.1373377353786; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 06:42:33 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from heechee (pool-72-70-84-160.bstnma.east.verizon.net. [72.70.84.160]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ww6sm20008121vec.5.2013.07.09.06.42.32 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Jul 2013 06:42:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: <51DB74FD.1090507@cs.ucla.edu> (Paul Eggert's message of "Mon, 08 Jul 2013 19:27:09 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlIWZMpOGz+5F2n5Vm7lA7HunA0XyDzrzhz9vnHf3nHtYkRHrKZWdIEdXeKua31ml9a3MiL X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:76129 Archived-At: On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 19:27:09 -0700 Paul Eggert wrote: PE> On 07/08/2013 07:54 AM, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: >> Anyway, I just don't see much of an upside to changing the what symbols >> are used in internal data structures. PE> Emacs source code should avoid misspellings even in PE> comments and in symbols used only internally. This is PE> because the misspellings can cause confusion among PE> developers, who are the main audience for the code. I disagree for internal symbols, and because IMHO this is not a misspelling. There is very specific meaning to "unexist" that I can't think of a way to convey easily by any other simple verbs. PE> I could mark "unexist" as a word that is allowed to be PE> in Emacs source code and documentation -- but then that word PE> is more likely to slip into places where it's not wanted. I don't think that's a huge risk. Ted