From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13339: 24.3.50; doc of `next-frame' Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 05:20:05 -0800 Message-ID: <87lhxlpwqi.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: <79C6D147824B47049C223D2476CEE799@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391865732 623 80.91.229.3 (8 Feb 2014 13:22:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 13:22:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13339@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 08 14:22:16 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WC7rL-0001O2-Hm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 14:22:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46607 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WC7rL-0005YD-48 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 08:22:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51718) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WC7rD-0005Xw-LX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 08:22:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WC7r8-00089B-N7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 08:22:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42713) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WC7r8-000897-Jg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 08:22:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WC7r7-0003yj-Th for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 08:22:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 13:22:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13339 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13339-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13339.139186569215251 (code B ref 13339); Sat, 08 Feb 2014 13:22:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13339) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2014 13:21:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56732 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WC7qd-0003xu-Mq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 08:21:32 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:34298) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WC7qb-0003xl-4N for 13339@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 08:21:29 -0500 Original-Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WC7qM-00034d-3a; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 14:21:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: <79C6D147824B47049C223D2476CEE799@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Wed, 2 Jan 2013 10:56:41 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1WC7qM-00034d-3a MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1392470475.10573@p/yUU1ix4UkWFmOvCnd4gA X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:84958 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: > The doc (both doc string and Elisp manual) is unclear for the default > case where argument MINIFRAME/MINIBUF is nil. (BTW, the same parameter > name should be used here for the doc string and the manual.) > > What is unclear is which frames are _included_ in this case. The only > thing we are told is that minibuffer-only frames are _excluded_. Does > that mean that all other frames are included? Or only visible frames? > Or only visible or iconified frames? > > Other values of this argument make clear which frames are included, but > the doc for a nil value of the argument is incomplete. Uhm... yeah... clear. >"? Do you have a suggestion as to what the nil case should say? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/