From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: nljlistbox2@gmail.com (N. Jackson) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20068: 24.4.91; Too many warnings building Emacs Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 08:47:58 -0300 Message-ID: <87lhj3ycup.fsf@moondust.localdomain> References: <87mw3lhj53.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <83egox5rs8.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1426074570 1090 80.91.229.3 (11 Mar 2015 11:49:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 11:49:30 +0000 (UTC) To: 20068-done@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 11 12:49:20 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YVf8X-0001gb-1U for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 12:49:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54015 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVf8W-0007ct-6R for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 07:49:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56152) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVf8O-0007co-7O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 07:49:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVf8J-0007KJ-7f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 07:49:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43781) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVf8J-0007KB-3V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 07:49:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YVf8I-000412-O3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 07:49:02 -0400 Resent-From: nljlistbox2@gmail.com (N. Jackson) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 11:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 20068 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug wontfix Mail-Followup-To: 20068@debbugs.gnu.org, nljlistbox2@gmail.com, nljlistbox2@gmail.com Original-Received: via spool by 20068-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D20068.142607449015353 (code D ref 20068); Wed, 11 Mar 2015 11:49:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20068-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Mar 2015 11:48:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42349 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YVf7R-0003zZ-H6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 07:48:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ig0-f169.google.com ([209.85.213.169]:34833) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YVf7Q-0003zJ-8P for 20068-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 07:48:08 -0400 Original-Received: by igqa13 with SMTP id a13so38771563igq.0 for <20068-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 04:48:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=jng+n73W1D0noWGq2o2KlkuJfUTWJFiyNi3k0fmcQpg=; b=NX/BmooJdEbabv0YcKOufSqBNDJqegK2hBJeDhQ9d2dWo3+O9zVmyUTnLdE4/a15am mypEVrgtOEcXH5mgPiN1ha1rbb5bBA9GwpjpBiDRFu6GY/G0Wk423ZfVpaoMUhj5Rzao 3GCWOOm/M43p4ZttcHqsDfNmziuc9u0xtrEZisHEl6phZD41jpLRMMO0YO7FlWoSJ7IQ CsHPoIKcll/cBce9yx5ZgxLeh+Ltm7jupmNk3HWoMRFHMVx6Pv2MNnRYRwwrv0GGE/24 XykwGZujMfq2AnBFdIx0dnFs8sLRaUs0fD5kJjx2KLW1yuiad65oBpPGdjSjxto3uoES DJfg== X-Received: by 10.107.129.141 with SMTP id l13mr55260315ioi.91.1426074482244; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 04:48:02 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from moondust.localdomain.nodomain.none (blk-7-145-248.eastlink.ca. [71.7.145.248]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o1sm2299881igv.18.2015.03.11.04.47.59 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Mar 2015 04:48:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83egox5rs8.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 10 Mar 2015 07:45:59 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.91 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:100368 Archived-At: At 02:45 -0300 on Tuesday 2015-03-10, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Glenn Morris >> >> If you get that many warnings, you must be doing a bootstrap > > No, he isn't. A small number of Lisp files are byte-compiled when > building a release tarball (this was fixed by you on master, I think), > and the files he mentions are those. Glen is right, actually. I neglected to read the README and INSTALL files (Sorry. I've read them now.) and, instead, I just used my usual build recipe which includes a bootstrap. Rebuilding with a bare make after a fresh extraction from the tarball, I get 37 warnings which is much less overwhelming than than 158! >> Lisp compilation errors are never (good enough) platform specific and >> can always be ignored by non-developers. > > Indeed, in this case I looked at the reported warnings and saw nothing > grave there, I'm quite sure I saw the same warnings when I built the > pretest. Well if nothing can reasonably be done about any of the warnings that's unfortunate, of course, since it cheapens their value, but it's just one of those things I suppose. I'm closing this. Thank you for Emacs.