From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Markus Triska Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23871: 25.1.50; Undo unexpectedly leads to blank buffer Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 01:03:40 +0200 Message-ID: <87lh1fsn5f.fsf@metalevel.at> References: <83h9cavdgj.fsf@gnu.org> <87poqyy2tc.fsf@metalevel.at> <87vb0qqrkz.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87h9c9zx75.fsf@metalevel.at> <834m89vmyv.fsf@gnu.org> <878txlsbdb.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87furtccdv.fsf@metalevel.at> <877fd5q9te.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83bn2gtruk.fsf@gnu.org> <87k2h37pvb.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87vb0lta67.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87d1mscw58.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87h9c3g70o.fsf@metalevel.at> <87furnd9f5.fsf@russet.org.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1467759869 16751 80.91.229.3 (5 Jul 2016 23:04:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 23:04:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23871@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier To: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 06 01:04:20 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bKZO8-0003YK-49 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2016 01:04:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58502 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bKZO3-0002vS-V8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 19:04:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60129) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bKZNv-0002tU-Ns for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 19:04:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bKZNq-0007if-Hs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 19:04:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54596) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bKZNq-0007iQ-Ei for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 19:04:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bKZNp-0002XG-V5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 19:04:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Markus Triska Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 23:04:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23871 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23871-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23871.14677598249721 (code B ref 23871); Tue, 05 Jul 2016 23:04:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23871) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jul 2016 23:03:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38700 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bKZNX-0002Wj-Nu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 19:03:44 -0400 Original-Received: from metalevel.at ([78.46.218.83]:53554) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bKZNV-0002WZ-Hf for 23871@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 19:03:42 -0400 Original-Received: by metalevel.at (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 78E7AA0251; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 01:03:40 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87furnd9f5.fsf@russet.org.uk> (Phillip Lord's message of "Tue, 05 Jul 2016 23:09:18 +0100") User-Agent: Emacs/24.4 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:120472 Archived-At: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) writes: > I'm amazed at how you spot all of these! Thanks to your extremely nice work on these issues, I am encouraged to file more of them. I am very glad that these issues are being corrected! I have found more issues with undo for which I don't have reproducible cases yet, and I can tell you more about them if you are interested. They may depend on the exact timing of process output and user input. > Can we start a new bug for this? We've been discussing about 4 different > bugs on this thread, and IIUC, Eli's fixed this one. I have filed #23903 for this, let us continue the discussion there. It's also great that you are including these snippets as actual test cases that are run automatically! Thank you and all the best, Markus