From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24966: 26.0.50; test-completion with alist COLLECTION calls PREDICATE incorrectly Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 22:31:34 -0500 Message-ID: <87lgvsfm95.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> References: <87shqnpxym.fsf@udel.edu> <87fumljw98.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87eg1wisck.fsf_-_@users.sourceforge.net> <20161128205917.GA17197@holos.localdomain> <878ts3hsh7.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <20161130020415.GA23610@holos.localdomain> <20161206015038.GA25281@holos.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1481081475 29370 195.159.176.226 (7 Dec 2016 03:31:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 03:31:15 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: 24966@debbugs.gnu.org To: Mark Oteiza Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 07 04:31:11 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cESwo-0006hC-P6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 04:31:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36145 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cESws-0005EC-NC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 22:31:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48827) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cESwl-0005DN-Aj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 22:31:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cESwg-0003ok-Ef for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 22:31:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43246) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cESwg-0003o7-CT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 22:31:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cESwg-0007j3-21 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 22:31:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 03:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24966 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed patch Original-Received: via spool by 24966-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24966.148108144329654 (code B ref 24966); Wed, 07 Dec 2016 03:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24966) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Dec 2016 03:30:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58645 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cESwN-0007i9-6o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 22:30:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-io0-f174.google.com ([209.85.223.174]:34488) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cESwK-0007hk-Ee; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 22:30:40 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-io0-f174.google.com with SMTP id c21so634973946ioj.1; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 19:30:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=ndpR9iCJUYVJtUIIt4h/hIujDn4u+vxwH5Sxvh4Xo/M=; b=As4N0OFezVo0pdzP8Ve4BlT3jTqdrMNBCtxdsBXYOwnsvhPNzGJjaUjSwv9GiVuN9E u/SghesJ86tPvzJnJ9jkx7TCkIaJGG9MG4Gu89UotOzVi0BIFd7aGrgoIZx0J0QVXuQ6 DwvEosBYGFfTtSjghF/FCmjeOzkSFI/hJfvAsuU1CH547lSCq/qPnoQ2KK7nGZRN8IQe H0s8cOgCrDqFYvkKxXleSLYIMx/DzQg/NKtjWRVNYG5PPiTt8JO9GyTJUYuCinUR8UU3 CYuZU5/ytjKRcECMFUFuEmGYsICwnjPhhbuSg+TPf0bfafbaMh0C3H9xqnlIpZzBW2Qn mB+Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=ndpR9iCJUYVJtUIIt4h/hIujDn4u+vxwH5Sxvh4Xo/M=; b=YgQJPGh0hA6CaJaY/r3gKekOw7Qe20w12TH50uiXI7x5lOc8Mil2NdDt53pBDi56qj mBBOHioQHEPG86a5vNtu8GKzT3XfSOrsMCIydPGoXR6wAyPTUeybzWin5gOvxkW028Ez 6qzkKPX8ZljEfVPl28m6g4kC+mc0emhBJlxozDN7jXjNaPvhfzztWfGamhJqdDBDW1U6 gfUYk4oZ/62qgU/ZMi+ItykT0Gy7OLWNtNjCNedmRT70q2MzQu32syVkVxPgC5ssIuBJ BM1MgM8xaq7wYpYdsAeQsyeoSyzUY0HdpnCqFfQxYUc8ko9A/Z1Lnab7cN1rjFpbeEgz 1Y8A== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC01VkC3zzqLdBfDJwdW2tjktapz/1v0dlp0GmBIZN2tW6koAnQBzOAYPZwW4eQKS2Q== X-Received: by 10.36.80.74 with SMTP id m71mr504585itb.122.1481081434572; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 19:30:34 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from zony ([45.2.7.65]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id i200sm2689773itb.0.2016.12.06.19.30.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 06 Dec 2016 19:30:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20161206015038.GA25281@holos.localdomain> (Mark Oteiza's message of "Mon, 5 Dec 2016 20:50:38 -0500") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:126576 Archived-At: tags 24966 fixed close 24966 quit Mark Oteiza writes: > On 29/11/16 at 09:04pm, Mark Oteiza wrote: >> > >>> >> > >>> npostavs@users.sourceforge.net writes: >> > >>> >> > >>> While adding tests, I found another inconsistency: when given a >> > >>> hashtable with symbol keys, test-completion passes the symbol-name to >> > >>> PREDICATE, while all-completions and try-completion pass the original >> > >>> symbol key. Here are two patches, the first for this bug, and the >> > >>> second for the other inconsistency. >> >> Thanks, all is well here with these patches > > Anything holding back applying these? I was waiting to see if there were any comments, especially about the second patch, but it's been long enough by now. Pushed as 60fe6301, 2a3420d9.