From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=B6ktu=C4=9F?= Kayaalp Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#26589: Can't built Emacs from source (both master and 25.1 from tarball fail) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 20:49:53 +0300 Message-ID: <87lgqswcvy.fsf@xi.bootis> References: <83bmrpacni.fsf@gnu.org> <87k26co228.fsf@xi.bootis> <87y3uspdwt.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1492883412 13721 195.159.176.226 (22 Apr 2017 17:50:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 17:50:12 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Cadadr , 26589@debbugs.gnu.org To: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 22 19:50:07 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d1zAb-0003OB-S3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 19:50:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36392 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1zAh-0004LQ-GO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 13:50:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59003) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1zAZ-0004LK-Cv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 13:50:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1zAY-00078H-Bl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 13:50:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36452) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1zAY-00078C-8U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 13:50:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d1zAX-00056j-Vi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 13:50:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=B6ktu=C4=9F?= Kayaalp Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 17:50:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26589 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: unreproducible Original-Received: via spool by 26589-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26589.149288340019622 (code B ref 26589); Sat, 22 Apr 2017 17:50:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 26589) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Apr 2017 17:50:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34651 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d1zAW-00056O-7u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 13:50:00 -0400 Original-Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:34137) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d1zAU-00056F-1j for 26589@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 13:49:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mfilter12-d.gandi.net (mfilter12-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.129]) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4610A172097; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 19:49:56 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter12-d.gandi.net Original-Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]) by mfilter12-d.gandi.net (mfilter12-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rSbVWKc_pMjX; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 19:49:54 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 95.65.176.216 Original-Received: from xi.bootis.xi.bootis (unknown [95.65.176.216]) (Authenticated sender: self@gkayaalp.com) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AB16D1720A5; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 19:49:53 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87y3uspdwt.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> (npostavs's message of "Sat, 22 Apr 2017 13:09:38 -0400") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:131881 Archived-At: On 2017-04-22 13:09 +04, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net wrote: > retitle 26589 Build error: TIT dictionary doesn=E2=80=99t have body part > tags 26589 unreproducible > close 26589=20 > quit > > G=C3=B6ktu=C4=9F Kayaalp writes: > >>> >>> Try running configure with REL_ALLOC=3Dno. >> >> I've had to switch linux distros on my workstation (Xubuntu->Fedora), >> and now the build completes perfectly, without errors. Not having >> access to a Xubuntu installation, I can't reproduce or further debug >> this issue, I'm sorry. >> >> But both OS's had GCC 6 on them, and maybe what caused the failure on >> Xubuntu was a certain configuration of the compiler on that platform. >> Again, I can't test the configuration variable on that system, please >> excuse me. But on Fedora with GCC 6.3.1 and without REL_ALLOC=3Dno, Ema= cs >> does compile. > > The segfault during building sounds like the rel_alloc thing; even if > you can build 25.1 on Fedora without REL_ALLOC=3Dno it's probably just a > coincidence. That build will likely crash later. I actually use whatever is the default value for REL_ALLOC, and I only have built master as of today (eb52828a439f674733ba70844b795c6673733572). > But the other error must be something else. > >> I guess this bug report can be closed if there's nobody else that can >> reproduce the problem. Again, sorry for the botherment. > > I searched for the error and found only this: > https://qiang51.wordpress.com/2012/06/17/the-annoying-appledouble-file/ > which seems to be about some (macOS specific?) incorrect unpacking of > the sources. > > Anyway, closing for now, if it comes up again we can reopen. Best, -gk.