From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Robert Marshall Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#29661: 27.0.50; emacs crashing on exchange-point-and-mark Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 09:49:34 +0000 Message-ID: <87lgi88edt.fsf@ctlt579.codethink.co.uk> References: <87o9n5s30t.fsf@ctlt579.codethink.co.uk> <5A2F99D5.7010709@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1513072214 31308 195.159.176.226 (12 Dec 2017 09:50:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 09:50:14 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 29661@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 12 10:50:11 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eOhCT-0007lh-H7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 10:50:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57408 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOhCX-0001kw-Nf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 04:50:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48211) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOhCQ-0001kp-PG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 04:50:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOhCM-0004uK-Vv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 04:50:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49016) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOhCM-0004tw-SN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 04:50:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eOhCM-0007lO-Dp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 04:50:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Marshall Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 09:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 29661 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 29661-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B29661.151307217829793 (code B ref 29661); Tue, 12 Dec 2017 09:50:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 29661) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Dec 2017 09:49:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57697 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eOhBx-0007kT-MD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 04:49:37 -0500 Original-Received: from imap1.codethink.co.uk ([176.9.8.82]:49270) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eOhBw-0007kJ-Bx for 29661@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 04:49:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [167.98.27.229] (helo=ct-lt-579.codethink.co.uk) by imap1.codethink.co.uk with esmtpsa (Exim 4.84_2 #1 (Debian)) id 1eOhBx-0006pt-CV; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 09:49:37 +0000 In-Reply-To: <5A2F99D5.7010709@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Tue, 12 Dec 2017 09:56:53 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:140976 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: >> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. >> delete_frame (frame=, force=force@entry=XIL(0x98a0)) at frame.c:2064 >> 2064 struct frame *f1 = XFRAME (frame1); > > So it seems we always have to check Vframe_list for emptyness before > running FOR_EACH_FRAME. Funny this was never seen before ... > I can also replicate this crash on version 24.4.1 - but maybe you're saying it's been a long term problem. Robert