From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22000: Patch addressing the menu-bar frame-resize interaction Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 15:46:41 +0200 Message-ID: <87lg6vxt8e.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87k2p8h1vn.fsf@isaac.fritz.box> <5B543148.1010004@gmx.at> <5B557ACA.4020106@gmx.at> <5BBF93CF.4060301@gmx.at> <5BC05EEB.9010609@gmx.at> <5BC0E405.90805@gmx.at> <5BC1AAE2.7070808@gmx.at> <5BC4DB0E.3050501@gmx.at> <5BC6E4F2.2030607@gmx.at> <5BC83F03.4050006@gmx.at> <87pnw7xvxm.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1539870311 6119 195.159.176.226 (18 Oct 2018 13:45:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 13:45:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22000@debbugs.gnu.org, David Engster To: Vivek Dasmohapatra Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 18 15:45:06 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gD8bn-0001Pi-70 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 15:45:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42499 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gD8dt-00088W-4a for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 09:47:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51506) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gD8dm-00088M-QA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 09:47:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gD8dj-0006Yz-L6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 09:47:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51976) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gD8dj-0006Ym-GC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 09:47:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gD8dh-0002Wu-MJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 09:47:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Pluim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 13:47:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22000 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22000-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22000.15398704129709 (code B ref 22000); Thu, 18 Oct 2018 13:47:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22000) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Oct 2018 13:46:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56234 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gD8dY-0002WX-Hn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 09:46:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-f65.google.com ([209.85.128.65]:52315) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gD8dW-0002WJ-HH for 22000@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 09:46:51 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-f65.google.com with SMTP id 189-v6so342569wmw.2 for <22000@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 06:46:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:mail-copies-to:gmane-reply-to-list :date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=foQG/q1EZTVrE6EVQLwrNxrPCE1+m+AVilHfRXCW7vM=; b=h9jBvNH6HIU2McXkKKwYM7c80yTP+oHkjYmswAGZtAj2MRxQtqb5Gg/UD+78T4KeQd hOkJmjzYWa2CBTdzelMLANOqh1vhxiQnhpM5ZrsdZnHU6MScJRclbgJGG9w075/g1Nh1 hsz3d3KZYZ8K94ob2Py+0yftK0PxZkxF0/mBAGSEfGSBTQnH0GP2r2l8R2eeyT1TxAIe qC4U91oxO3ADqDbyY9cFiJ3wjutOfPb4ZZLyLNjjDBf7RacN0nUKRfu8KKhZwNMEJ//p 7y+PfQOOhdzJEN0L2BKiUz1wZuke7l8g2ZYgZBmsVjX5DREMm6RpNVMSZkQiphe4FkcA ioow== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:mail-copies-to :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=foQG/q1EZTVrE6EVQLwrNxrPCE1+m+AVilHfRXCW7vM=; b=MNzVkmWr11ot38VG3u9LgqpntCw1gx2PkaX2laLV1PsOazuik0tJsp/0xYwBrmtm2A El/yXqTF3wzK9s0LxISxRN00QIxb7PQajqcumKtFgLr+AMLruDQ9uTNVPb/aurYEoKq+ xpU44K0fqSXT/KOh3izB3TB5OvS0Bi9NPRbZmZhdys5Idh+lv1OuoSEZykyO/8vNyKY5 CL+Qvt9JrOX8Hg+GS8yQ9sTtoRMVj8MdWYZgbCtW9xNDmr7PzE/Qw7dPXlSBkYXbdqbV oe48p9Fh9J/1C2GInYOyDJ2KN2Euo1VVD3TcR0EF0tpJYik7GuF30ayrs3MukwWodVtl IQAw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfojzYzTId5IiDBNpPUbgqoD3IMmwQYUFL0GWGS/rEXn6EP9Qis9Q Yn2cLtuZJdI/IXo83WEqsN4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV61sJdjAbWUrTZFgQ0KghHsnk0z517XzMuBlj0ERAu0RfrCUQQIQX5VODlDbnCmzaKSXXyVybA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:1dc8:: with SMTP id d191-v6mr372953wmd.27.1539870404248; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 06:46:44 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rpluim-ubuntu ([149.5.228.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 77-v6sm413095wmv.6.2018.10.18.06.46.42 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 18 Oct 2018 06:46:43 -0700 (PDT) Mail-Copies-To: never Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: (Vivek Dasmohapatra's message of "Thu, 18 Oct 2018 14:24:14 +0100 (BST)") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:151375 Archived-At: Vivek Dasmohapatra writes: >> What is the 'root frame'? Surely the only frame that matters is the >> one displaying the menu bar? > > That is the root frame. OK > >> I=CA=BCd drop the 'any other value' portion, so as not to constrain any >> future changes. > > On this specific point, no: I want to clearly document that any unrecogni= sed > value will result in the default behaviour. > OK > As to the rest of the changes: Presumably they can be tidied up when/if > the patches are committed? I don't particularly want to enter an infinite > edit loop here on the BTS (although thanks for the proofreading). I was not proposing such a loop, merely offering suggestions that I thought would aid clarity. Since we=CA=BCre on the subject: I scanned the other patches, and there are various minor formatting issues there: no double space at the end of sentence, missing period at the end of sentence, plus some stray "\n" in lisp doc strings. No need to resend, though :-) > PS: Regarding the capital-after-a-colon question - this is a rigidly > defined area of doubt and uncertainty. There appears to be no hard-and-fa= st > rule, only whatever's in various house style guides. I=CA=BCd argue that based on consistency capital letters should only be used at the start of a sentence, and in this case it=CA=BCs a dependent clause, not a separate sentence. But that=CA=BCs not a very strong rule, I=CA=BCll admit. Robert