From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16493: 24.3.50; (setq search-invisible t) is useless, let's allow to turn visible-mode temporarily on Date: Wed, 01 May 2019 07:40:31 -0400 Message-ID: <87lfzqo11s.fsf@gmail.com> References: <878uucaun0.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <871u01zs19.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87r481fuvk.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87k3dtl8lp.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87ppcwxiv9.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87h9xw7puw.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87bno3vae9.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87zi1nl812.fsf@bzg.fr> <87wowql4sd.fsf@bzg.fr> <87y33snmam.fsf@gmail.com> <87sgtzof4s.fsf@gmail.com> <83lfzrsemu.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="146673"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) Cc: bzg@gnu.org, 16493@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 01 13:41:22 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hLnbx-000bx5-Kg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 May 2019 13:41:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55326 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hLnbw-0006L4-MK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 May 2019 07:41:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53157) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hLnbo-0006GL-MG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 May 2019 07:41:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hLnbk-0008Lo-6p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 May 2019 07:41:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58269) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hLnbi-0008KH-83 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 May 2019 07:41:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hLnbi-0008V0-3i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 May 2019 07:41:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 May 2019 11:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16493 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 16493-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16493.155671084132633 (code B ref 16493); Wed, 01 May 2019 11:41:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16493) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2019 11:40:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43579 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hLnbN-0008UH-4J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 May 2019 07:40:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qt1-f182.google.com ([209.85.160.182]:34679) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hLnbL-0008U5-MO for 16493@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 May 2019 07:40:40 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qt1-f182.google.com with SMTP id j6so19709104qtq.1 for <16493@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 01 May 2019 04:40:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=LD1tWFDN9g2NrLfTR7LhpyQqP8r0ckFQgvJ75UtRKGw=; b=caceBUsLDNuSZHovvjXTbkiTvBhoPGLbDWKOP9k/BNokkOMoV/+c/we/Gyz3Hvkd1r DDI6QGsr2jSg38PWiecHhpms1aFT4YlAGkXHpiaJNcjc38w5HA79qMvl1gHIcVzAPGqt okqTfvCNxES2lb6YjiQl22hkaPMme39Y5DHCdVU2ymji2CjTttlDBeY8vsj9OvfCu3FP TMFcpUqm+yRdP28UzchLBaj3gwxP5O6cXuHckJw8HLceYjqtpuuOvOcRGEmIaCUbvzTI kGjTX8CHdyIwxevUxZ8KPllgHsbkN8uB60uT1pB8bY0s5fvQPB7OcSWmiQJqm1jgSkhz QDJQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=LD1tWFDN9g2NrLfTR7LhpyQqP8r0ckFQgvJ75UtRKGw=; b=cvbl5opFBud5AihKMOcBfu2hZK65e71IqUMrOv1LYUTYyyAqzuIbplUf0jppGA2sFj 6tWnvlbKmhoXNLkEcrJgw3aQzJxneX8qzYnql92uVyKKSLzMsLivlbWT827EFnI4zmvJ DF+JwOynbwL4uUmmtGC8PB8D+0B139xOoVuQmweS/YLgxMauELQ7qvEA/UiHRJoZkh7g 9CB2vvUPt4cFRGwEtldbn1pVIIuppOXbpv5OIGeo3rETsJdygS8aOoLu1xALm63HnaEe /5AAIQi+uW3/YqvaSQ9LWZTBRnDA3ez2kyOkUfCFM9nN4wVQaMdfCQXq7bSu+Qq4F6U0 M3cQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUsz8l6NfqdYUoElIHmCtUUmbPToYp7ygb9ooY+4HKJ5SrtYxrX tb2b5OCTBeUfJbYHjwl4X7xXU/tH X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxdCsM1/k1BRW7B+1Phs4nOT9PQgmOH7/WaBU9qIjlco+wyiDbDjf14LbH3EN2fsRV70n1aZQ== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:23b7:: with SMTP id q52mr12148003qtq.293.1556710834001; Wed, 01 May 2019 04:40:34 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from minid (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id q11sm9398965qkn.19.2019.05.01.04.40.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 01 May 2019 04:40:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83lfzrsemu.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 30 Apr 2019 18:21:13 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:158569 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Stefan Monnier >> PS: To fix this quirk, we should change buffer-invisibility-spec's >> default value to nil (or `(t)`, maybe) instead of t. (t) makes sense, I'd say. > That'd be confusing, IMO. If we need to change some of the semantics > of buffer-invisibility-spec, It's not a change to semantics though, just the default value. And starting from the current default of t, if some code does (add-to-invisibility-spec 'foo) followed by (remove-from-invisibility-spec 'foo) you get (t), so arguably just starting from there in the first place makes things less confusing than they are now.