From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37321: 27.0.50; Excessive gc in a use case (el-search) Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 11:11:56 +0200 Message-ID: <87lftvzjmr.fsf@web.de> References: <87lfv1pm5x.fsf@web.de> <874l1mc01w.fsf@web.de> <87woeidd4g.fsf@web.de> <733d0142-51ee-55df-de0c-cca7c989b370@cs.ucla.edu> <875zlgu2y8.fsf@web.de> <6d670180-e2ee-030f-ef0e-ad0c5c7a8ef5@cs.ucla.edu> <87tv8zs2r9.fsf@web.de> <83tv8zl0es.fsf@gnu.org> <87sgo3typ1.fsf@web.de> <83o8yry56c.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="232550"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, 37321@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 08 11:13:55 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iHlZ5-000yPu-A9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 11:13:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52720 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iHlZ4-0004JL-0X for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 05:13:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34130) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iHlYF-0004JA-Iz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 05:13:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iHlYE-0003rq-Mb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 05:13:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40706) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iHlYE-0003rd-Ix for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 05:13:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHlYE-0002Ki-DE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 05:13:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 09:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 37321-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37321.15705259328909 (code B ref 37321); Tue, 08 Oct 2019 09:13:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37321) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Oct 2019 09:12:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49527 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHlXP-0002Jd-Om for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 05:12:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([217.72.192.78]:56583) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHlXN-0002JO-BZ for 37321@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 05:12:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1570525910; bh=xwLELe8jjQ5owmSTObCbEp89Ui0nwMWauu/Y/St4oZQ=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=FWG4D44naHue4Ft79MdqIoFRYtBn10+oXYjHNeliJQGyq+t5OTjvX2hcOht79t2GK M80+duckVokQhR6ZF1X2EcBdwYdaMfB/Uialztdh1P61ZIM+Lgi0bYIIRyZqM3XjFI DBWOR736LU2enZVBerSoQrOSBBEGzeUazocr6ujY= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([94.218.185.16]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb101 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MIeQO-1iFZfy1zjs-002KdM; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 11:11:50 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83o8yry56c.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 08 Oct 2019 12:09:31 +0300") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:fmYyP+LPGNn1z3/izqXsN1L2hJdTbgHF5EwA08u3ZmrtuMvkOBR c1nvGQZXIuknb8VvW7pGJd19qfNHfpzQ58sRZje5ewUGd8kCjV7UGGd0iiHBFUieSoQkYpw 386P9VNudsvSjRqw11/abRVnPQ72JzqDfx5E721MpHeAWToSOBztTvgs9u8SvnfjzvzZ0+D rlhMHhgQlXsvHSWhCcSQw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:+cJ3jLBq9hQ=:iggVYd1eS7ujXPiQS3WMzs ZIW0wF9UaPGzypl3+zj9adumhyvNsewjSFyP2yvsToIQdHxLUZ1f1aODGf92lZefOvMOfNw0x NlNwWu+v6ibX6dZW+3bvFMjAkyFEjnTGG9EZ7RNw1dwaFIwKvkHPjW9Y/aAo3j+cNUTvVSIft Z5BLRiUyrhhzaZeOE2yUgOu89F3xgkZ3vqrn1u1go6mZJZrQ5I2X3bXolBE0U3HwQmRPqtOUY wpJ89kVQEwJaMSIrVh7bwOTfzbRBDXpbXw8V8fd3o/Q2XLd1CC5AIXJ7lGH2CDdF/tOj8EvQS qV2Rtcv5Hiwzj7rHn+zkww038rBCHeCkzay90JaFLKcwoYLIuNmm0wh4wCJVi7cuA43vWj/zr Q+HI+cL7tENbeAv7ne8NocD3dAzwMSvJcTtzhHB4Z3jJ2+NX5dMv9jP6OeiqXSYMQqUo1HkIH 6aNjFCDv+R5Ryuld7KxhIVJEN/qYOS0mLej3ywl93KP0XaGS7uZ14ltcGMCsCtdWnsGkdO+4k 7W8/DWHrf6kxLmzYtqiXQLw7G7SGF8LIb1WtylfVknXOYHLXnyf+DYIL7f2cQmBwxc3P+vGpz jRn+jfu5IU/vQ+UmBvpL3mMXpsnCyZXUqje48vW9YUn88beE8Ma7Lr497wtU88KG8YlO0z+c2 66V1FnebOiaoLivGmscVUOUm3UpYBGnIeQdRTYVIkvrx2rtQbN+KwKEgmjls8Zy/7znZZ+SyD 5kNNg/fIl+cd73PDg+RSdko0nnF3V6VmeRJ6IOrXnQsFpTnUaoSn4xuiFX5X2Zi1rqSNs9l3 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:168620 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > No, I think it's too high for being the default (you can, of course, > do that locally). Can you instead increase gc-cons-threshold, leaving > the percentage at its default value, and see if you can get the same > good results? It is much easier for us to bump gc-cons-threshold > (assuming the higher value is still reasonable), because that is an > absolute number, so it is independent of the heap size. Sure. Which value would you suggest? Michael.