From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#139: describe-key vs. widget red tape Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 20:57:57 +0200 Message-ID: <87lftrm7nu.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87mynwgrxb.fsf@jidanni.org> <877e5ql42d.fsf@gnus.org> <8336gedyus.fsf@gnu.org> <874l0ugrl4.fsf@gnus.org> <83sgoechsf.fsf@gnu.org> <87v9t9bzng.fsf@gnus.org> <874l0s8x8s.fsf@gnus.org> <878spyemgo.fsf@tcd.ie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="54465"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: "Basil L. Contovounesios" , 139@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org To: Mauro Aranda Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 11 21:02:11 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iJ0B1-000E0G-1F for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 21:02:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56000 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iJ0Az-000238-TC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 15:02:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34384) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iJ080-00005J-87 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 14:59:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iJ07y-00078s-5S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 14:59:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51513) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iJ07y-00078g-2H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 14:59:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iJ07x-0007e6-SH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 14:59:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 18:59:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 139 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 139-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B139.157082028629272 (code B ref 139); Fri, 11 Oct 2019 18:59:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 139) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Oct 2019 18:58:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60330 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iJ073-0007c4-W0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 14:58:06 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:40416) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iJ071-0007br-HE for 139@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 14:58:04 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iJ06v-0001Lg-Ve; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 20:58:00 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Mauro Aranda's message of "Fri, 11 Oct 2019 11:38:13 -0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:169006 Archived-At: Mauro Aranda writes: > I finally found some time to keep working on this. > > I reworked the patch with the useful suggestion from Basil. I think I > addressed all the points raised, and that the patch looks much better > now. I went with `describe-widget' for the name of the command, but > have no preference over the name, so if someone suggests something > better, I'm OK with it. I think this looks great. It just needs a NEWS entry and a mention in the Emacs (or Elisp?) manual (somewhere close to where describe-function etc is documented). And as Drew says, we should consider hooking this up to `C-h k' when on a button/widget, perhaps. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no