From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Sergey Organov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#40097: 28.0.50; Preferred font ignored for specific charset Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 18:10:53 +0300 Message-ID: <87lfnxwveq.fsf@osv.gnss.ru> References: <87r1xriovt.fsf@osv.gnss.ru> <831rprgg2g.fsf@gnu.org> <87tv2narke.fsf@osv.gnss.ru> <83wo7jey86.fsf@gnu.org> <87o8su9ssk.fsf@osv.gnss.ru> <83k13hg28j.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="3473"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 40097@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 18 16:12:12 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jEaMe-0000nL-00 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 16:12:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52198 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jEaMc-0001dF-TD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 11:12:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54254) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jEaMV-0001d9-8Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 11:12:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jEaMU-0002Ac-2Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 11:12:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35073) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jEaMT-0002AF-Ug for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 11:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jEaMT-0004V1-Q6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 11:12:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Sergey Organov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 15:12:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40097 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 40097-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40097.158454426317227 (code B ref 40097); Wed, 18 Mar 2020 15:12:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 40097) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Mar 2020 15:11:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41046 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jEaLX-0004Tn-8p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 11:11:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lj1-f181.google.com ([209.85.208.181]:39357) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jEaLV-0004T8-Qx for 40097@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 11:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lj1-f181.google.com with SMTP id a2so1902584ljk.6 for <40097@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 08:11:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=47drGytoR3ri6Do68115pY2vuI30/7x6njWHNHguabo=; b=uPHCDp8wQY4NXE0P6vZw2hADRqAnwb7G+GOowC/5HBCQuZJGNqRxEKn0o8HzKazgBf roG6dHh0uudQt+LQYKedYG1c5KqfFySZbrqGt3jBKTJBAHACbUxb5MlJ1EVpTUnBYxP2 INpMHZ9eUZK/LYlBQPOfnaU7Qr4RoTMcMX//81YCArqZv/5WL4by5UAcQ49b9kZEIDbI /t9RL4OOescPUdiJcK/PoMmT9rrHakn6ToORb0sAXllcMwcf9XfBV22JdoJ0YoPZy+Hn nCYv1iZw63ndBToaZrGjT2s0HpVnR6nYHbq2fevYXdiiM2O8heP5ExOwchc6yjnVvt7t 155A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=47drGytoR3ri6Do68115pY2vuI30/7x6njWHNHguabo=; b=cAc8GNqd++C86RLULw279Fx7jx7o4S4/PBQ8fJOhzDLjr5LEDpOjTr50CughJ2dVz2 O3Vjli/sjFS3VDVZ/O6uIvzygZtvNNvBt6xFFtdHzmKCAtcr68gnHUUrNzthHXkLrapn aK32F16hCJBMT+/smMv0p/LuW3212hPpEb5rNQnnh35q5v5/nFTGKvZL2aYdWs/7b+5k F7/ZYoU9KYpDfMEfS0aSW7Z9KwGnwja/a6iWwCay45/BmvUwXkRW1P096QaxtAq2WgG9 Pv+Qc437L5k6mUSFR50FLg29/Rloxhlm1HoN6EE98ecoyb7LElnXYhzLGMB86unZptPV 8tNg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0+icg3xn/q6ZxdUmZwof6YheJPNjNPEev8r8kgURlShr3Vnue1 OTnqP931R/utOnhZFR6njwEcfRpl X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vuL61N70vYTQNyR3KBs32amy2veY72RYSwOpeceyFXx5Yb2Q63Pi2fuMRuD1BSWQbjXuN7mow== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b521:: with SMTP id z1mr2795132ljm.19.1584544255368; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 08:10:55 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from osv.localdomain ([89.175.180.246]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t207sm5440641lff.72.2020.03.18.08.10.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 18 Mar 2020 08:10:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83k13hg28j.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 18 Mar 2020 16:35:24 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:177502 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Sergey Organov >> Cc: Kenichi Handa , 40097@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 07:43:39 +0300 >> >> > We could perhaps introduce a customizable variable that would allow >> > users who want that to disable the preference of charset-supporting >> > fonts when the text has the 'charset' property. CC'ing Handa-san who >> > could comment on how important is this feature nowadays. >> >> When I wrote original question, I was sure I've read somewhere in the >> docs that Emacs does prefer fonts with particular encoding, and then I >> missed it and can't find it anymore. I wonder if it is even documented, >> or did I read it somewhere else, maybe in some relevant discussion? >> >> I mean if it's even undocumented and is not important nowadays, maybe >> it's indeed better to drop it rather than bother with customizations. >> And if it is to be customizable, it should probably be a fontset feature >> rather than global? > > The customizable option indeed only makes sense if the feature is > still useful to some users in some use cases; otherwise we should just > remove this. > > The fact that this is or isn't documented has no importance: we don't > document the internal implementation details, but we keep them as long > as they do what users expect and like. IMHO, in general, when a thing is documented its removal must receive more thought. Just another factor in favor of future support. Not much, but still... And this one apparently doesn't have it. -- Sergey