From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Mark A. Hershberger" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45056: 28.0.50; lexical-let doesn't work with returned closures on nativecomp Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 16:42:52 -0500 Message-ID: <87lfe8gejn.fsf@everybody.org> References: <87h7p05dax.fsf@everybody.org> <216496280.161579.1607203268073.JavaMail.zimbra@nichework.com> <1009119049.161679.1607205441220.JavaMail.zimbra@nichework.com> <119793380.161961.1607214402491.JavaMail.zimbra@nichework.com> <87v9deiuaf.fsf@everybody.org> <87h7ow2vj3.fsf@everybody.org> <87pn3kgh81.fsf@everybody.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2653"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 45056@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 08 23:31:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kmlVm-0000ak-BI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 23:31:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47488 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kmlVk-0005hz-Jd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 17:31:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49292) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kmkmC-0004Cg-Iu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 16:44:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48471) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kmkmB-0004eX-A9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 16:44:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kmkmA-00027P-8C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 16:44:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Mark A. Hershberger" Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 21:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45056 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 45056-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45056.16074637928073 (code B ref 45056); Tue, 08 Dec 2020 21:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45056) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Dec 2020 21:43:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60017 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kmklL-000268-MY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 16:43:12 -0500 Original-Received: from nospam.nichework.com ([206.71.169.33]:37066) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kmklG-00025v-TQ for 45056@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 16:43:10 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdmain [127.0.0.1]) by nospam.nichework.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F362CB0054; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 16:42:06 -0500 (EST) Authentication-Results: nospam; dmarc=none header.from=nichework.com Authentication-Results: nospam.nichework.com; dkim=pass reason="2048-bit key; insecure key" header.d=nichework.com header.i=@nichework.com header.b=Q73pqL0u; dkim-adsp=pass; dkim-atps=neutral X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at nospam.nichework.com Original-Received: from nospam.nichework.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nospam.nichework.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 60naTnDL68PR; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 16:42:06 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail.nichework.com (mail.nichework.com [108.161.151.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by nospam.nichework.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6427FB004F; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 16:42:06 -0500 (EST) Authentication-Results: nospam; dmarc=none header.from=nichework.com Original-Received: from mail.nichework.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.nichework.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64F304E0136; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 21:43:04 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.nichework.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 491744E0171; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 21:43:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mail.nichework.com 491744E0171 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nichework.com; s=897144A4-59D1-11EA-885D-1509A2A44C35; t=1607463784; bh=I1zQ/Kr/qsiRFZw6Bja5880HexOHXPOikbCftkIwEuk=; h=From:To:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=Q73pqL0ukwlPAH1aTYKaYyFC2o5iGBAHUodu0D9AMaaQSt9XKtp6VWtFNPDo1S8gh At+n6qD0cFo/s949RMnUb0sXcSLb4asBJ/7JXlEte56Cxy3t2YTnAv8qABWQq43sFF Xpy2zYHjuePjh1t0w39d4X3tfFRvX78hQNM3xpq6OTVRSp4V0TQBeQ5AH/2a35Mvry dbnJC5VuqCj4DkfBJyosgIqGnhz6O4UFyIqGbtZyTZP9kTfKej5ZHR73yzfUMNuaHQ 7oUTciwA1aFrP7Mhp6Zl2+e3TPsAwyQGkV/gaZBcWjUQbK0howU+Gu4F/B0GwQb6aX CNk0nhLuV6FIQ== Original-Received: from mail.nichework.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.nichework.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id rKyrqO9EVxnF; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 21:43:04 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from silk.everybody.org (209-253-11-94.ip.mcleodusa.net [209.253.11.94]) by mail.nichework.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0395D4E0136; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 21:43:03 +0000 (UTC) X-URL: http://hexmode.com/ In-Reply-To: (Andrea Corallo's message of "Tue, 08 Dec 2020 21:28:12 +0000") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:195449 Archived-At: Andrea Corallo writes: > My suggestion would be to close this bug an open a new dedicated one > when we a get a reproducer to investigate on? That's fine. This can be closed.