From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#49869: Revert buffer? Yes/No/Maybe Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 23:43:43 +0300 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <87lf5h53u0.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <87im0la99d.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83pmutl8iv.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26217"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: 49869@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 04 23:01:14 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mBO0o-0006fi-GO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 23:01:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52190 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBO0m-0008Cx-I5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 17:01:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58350) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBO0c-0008BA-MN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 17:01:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33723) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBO0c-0007cL-8B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 17:01:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mBO0c-00020C-0t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 17:01:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 21:01:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49869 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 49869-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49869.16281108077618 (code B ref 49869); Wed, 04 Aug 2021 21:01:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 49869) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2021 21:00:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45269 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mBNzj-0001yl-3v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 17:00:07 -0400 Original-Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.198]:55873) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mBNzh-0001wo-1r for 49869@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 17:00:05 -0400 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E8E95C0004; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 20:59:57 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <83pmutl8iv.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 04 Aug 2021 15:05:44 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:211188 Archived-At: > Since we now have the use-short-answers option, why is it a problem to > have to confirm, if you could make it a single key? The problem is that by default the length of the key sequence when the user decides to revert the current buffer is 7 keys: 'C-x x g y e s RET' With the patch provided by Gregory the default length will be reduced to 4 keys: 'C-x x g y' or to 3 keys when there are no unsaved changes. The yes/no question is still asked when revert-buffer is called automatically - that makes sense. But when the user decided to revert the buffer explicitly, why require to type more keys?