From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Amin Bandali Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50009: 28.0.50; add CRLF to outgoing ERC protocol logger lines Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 18:37:15 -0400 Message-ID: <87lf3y7pic.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87v94chxbh.fsf@neverwas.me> <87czpb4ilx.fsf@neverwas.me> <87v9335te6.fsf@dick> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26340"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 50009@debbugs.gnu.org, "J.P." To: dick Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 15 00:38:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mQH46-0006kN-0n for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 00:38:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54146 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mQH44-00023R-Op for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 18:38:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45428) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mQH3y-00022x-9i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 18:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38819) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mQH3y-0001vE-2k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 18:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mQH3x-0004tF-Vj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 18:38:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Amin Bandali Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 22:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50009 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 50009-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50009.163165906118770 (code B ref 50009); Tue, 14 Sep 2021 22:38:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50009) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Sep 2021 22:37:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50365 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mQH3d-0004sg-Ao for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 18:37:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56536) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mQH3b-0004sR-Tr for 50009@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 18:37:40 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42140) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mQH3V-0001bF-MZ; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 18:37:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [2607:fea8:3fdf:f2d9:10b6:3211:b381:151e] (port=52356 helo=langa) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mQH3U-0005h1-9K; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 18:37:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87v9335te6.fsf@dick> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:214346 Archived-At: dick writes: > I think we can all agree this kind of "come to think of it" iteration is why > PR-based submission is superior to patches. Do we? What's superior about it?