From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: dick Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50009: 28.0.50; add CRLF to outgoing ERC protocol logger lines Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 12:35:00 -0400 Message-ID: <87lf3xpzkb.fsf@dick> References: <87v94chxbh.fsf@neverwas.me> <87czpb4ilx.fsf@neverwas.me> <87v9335te6.fsf@dick> <87lf3y7pic.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39286"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.14 (Gnus v5.14) Commercial/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 50009@debbugs.gnu.org, "J.P." To: Amin Bandali Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 15 19:12:26 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mQYSQ-000A0P-AG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 19:12:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40462 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mQYSO-00088L-A4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 13:12:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33124) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mQXtE-0004br-IP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 12:36:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41555) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mQXtC-0000MM-06 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 12:36:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mQXtB-0003MM-Pw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 12:36:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: dick Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 16:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50009 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 50009-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50009.163172371012851 (code B ref 50009); Wed, 15 Sep 2021 16:36:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50009) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Sep 2021 16:35:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53101 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mQXsM-0003LB-DT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 12:35:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qk1-f176.google.com ([209.85.222.176]:43796) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mQXsJ-0003KY-6z for 50009@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 12:35:08 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qk1-f176.google.com with SMTP id ay33so4047492qkb.10 for <50009@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 09:35:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=7c2/HxxHFiENoqKTwy4i+vu3SK8i522uokhNg7nBakA=; b=mo4lp1tl1HK6CPc7w96ct4tOpouFjSdBl/1+kxeQarbMRsUD6FAAmjjQKXoAIT12I+ sci8PRdG9CbaDAj2CoXqv2OW1lNQb7mS60SUwBW1cWRP9rC6VFSlQraFtdfi7FecOUcc ltQPeAxvrMILwjdbtPeUvnQU14h1O8R5yyUKHdvtAOXGgGigiAXAH91BR8JQpxP8C8hs zPpXx4dPa0tk0PY1QiBzuJEv18c2MxGkrEx6VERw4TchDPDKsr2pgNqAbGEtQvg5HAFl P3GeLOUScUAQaC7MJ1P5v+0IWBGPD0aV10CrS+aAxwk3azZik3w43lGCScMF4nEH92nt Cz2w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=7c2/HxxHFiENoqKTwy4i+vu3SK8i522uokhNg7nBakA=; b=lXXJzO5JbOmDNPVTFDbEU+x/NGShyoxhYS92dWzQ10YGW8k4UORtSQi8Bnz8xJUcaL SGIXdw5RJUX3tof8w0PmNLpY5iBCv5vFYCWR6IBe598iVHMjlLHcPNg3yZRHa7HTmafI 8HtVB8b1sB9E2MBEwgCiyXIvsZ0Jbn+o6tkXm2eP1oKJ/6gTWytucP1dS1ceB8J/h0j/ 24DtV2sh832JYabrAaeumVnAgWESv5zTauxq3R4xJA+VQaMjcDV9nOB2oQsVttZ/6iax EJ5S4YCk7k0YWrxjzFIjVSwDOuXyHJiMBoZcQBonoxPulWJHClnkJbyuzwvSOyfYUvBi UfIA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532pbhc/EBiWS6ZshJUeEAHqDR3vBFgSvjCFM7QlsDWryvUiDIUL Hsr37M9fwQppGaQ2PijZSg4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwYO+AKTwm3LSbV/dl+139Y3ZiJ/UhvB6nf5jM2YaqIs++/t73bR+4Ji/Noh6p2k5eRBoT2aw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1aa5:: with SMTP id bl37mr827532qkb.84.1631723701692; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 09:35:01 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([68.237.93.126]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x125sm366009qkd.8.2021.09.15.09.35.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 15 Sep 2021 09:35:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87lf3y7pic.fsf@gnu.org> (Amin Bandali's message of "Tue, 14 Sep 2021 18:37:15 -0400") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:214417 Archived-At: Sigh, it pains me to have to add to the verbiage maelstrom that is debbugs when the antiquity of GNU patch is self-evident. A maintainer's sanity is inversely related to how much reading he has to do. In a PR-based workflow, the changeset is unambiguous. On a platform like Github, the changeset is manifest (in pretty colors) from the "Files Changed" tab in a PR submission. Eleventh-hour revisions get incorporated without fuss via the mild genius of git. Here, OP has submitted several changesets, of which only the chronologically latest he wishes the maintainer to consider. To ascertain this fact, the maintainer must read, and recall his happiness is inversely proportional to how much reading he has to do. In a cluster**** like bug#45474 where literally every one and their third cousin is espousing a changeset, the maintainer not only has to read, he has to decide, and that is a whole other circle of hell. The programmer's tendency to pontificate and obfuscate (of which the present missive is a fine example) does not help matters.