From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12872: 24.2; Provide a feature to trigger mode-line redisplay Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2021 07:00:39 +0100 Message-ID: <87lf0ynugo.fsf@gnus.org> References: <837gpqwuai.fsf@gnu.org> <87o85xou2m.fsf@gnus.org> <83a6hg7qkh.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtlg6vzm.fsf@gnus.org> <83ee6s5fy4.fsf@gnu.org> <877dck5fbb.fsf@gnus.org> <83a6hg5f71.fsf@gnu.org> <87tufoxc10.fsf@gnus.org> <83zgpf4jqk.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmqaq0kl.fsf@gnus.org> <83ee6q3j2t.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37813"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 12872@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 06 07:01:56 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mu74W-0009fk-Du for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 07:01:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35400 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mu74V-00056J-Ct for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 01:01:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43436) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mu73e-00054k-Gc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 01:01:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48802) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mu73e-00031k-7g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 01:01:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mu73e-0000T3-5p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 01:01:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2021 06:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12872 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 12872-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12872.16387704501772 (code B ref 12872); Mon, 06 Dec 2021 06:01:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12872) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Dec 2021 06:00:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60348 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mu73S-0000SW-8x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 01:00:50 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:60766) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mu73R-0000SK-CL for 12872@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 01:00:49 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=7WyRK8Mv+3dYJRlZh6pVIzcyV5kRoe4sFlNfV4XWpGI=; b=iBH2q4QMndx3Kiwtcsw7AOJ7dJ DyX9dAFPNysnYmgVtNDXTH2DHLL+1MyqXK038G8U8lb9xAR8PsX2bHJ4Q9FTBlTx4II7EI6rYqwGX JErAIN97sNvoo99MbcdtaFyUteJ/X9D9I5FY8Ru070sgUGfAO4EzLfQal8iVoKfI8PxI=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mu73I-0002dL-96; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 07:00:43 +0100 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAD1BMVEUrJi11nLmnL0aw Gi////+K8Yg8AAAAAWJLR0QEj2jZUQAAAAd0SU1FB+UMBgUtHrYoNysAAAG1SURBVDjLjZMJbsQg DEVZLoDpBQhcIAP3v1v//yZLpUqtpZk4ed4NIZoVKxFSi4VSzEK1YCEkI4oWD4MARJMSgiWrJVYC 8FLi/g4vAjesCMsQCCqQ7lC1lECbWByYHR4aBXgWxgoRCEKbBlCDqtpSwiNr+XOsFvLR6amvkHNr c/ANIK8tt4nMYn70n2DcOlwyMowHwOnMDqbyTw/FLPydDmDaHHQY9yFQJ5pe/HLG+k5e1+zTmOW0 rxtMjAyPj8Ah0MeuyvSp6r/gv+ULwKKVBB0zfedQlN4d5DUTVbZgd7tcB2MkH9VTioNJb+2o84Xu AOHKTAArTevQPu+hB9Y4CaJAGtf+3gLitbS946sSnLh6TSR4vnGBXaNAS6joS82Wa4mIVbKl9ald 4F504xCP0ad2Ex9AK6QznqDJw6ytt7CB70mdD9SAzHltUDVRdJh5+Hof20Nb+0QBP5cEpqOhWaFz KsM3aOOI3VNsUFUWljDRBRzCBmNohbAbHgmq+kDu9RHgfCYud5RHYy1NgAs9aG7sYKVUHXDAiq/7 piM378sXTdcRt/i9qD8k9dbSbyDy9v8jwDePd3DtvJKNeAAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTpjcmVhdGUAMjAy MS0xMi0wNlQwNTo0NTozMCswMDowMJymWlcAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6bW9kaWZ5ADIwMjEtMTItMDZU MDU6NDU6MzArMDA6MDDt++LrAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Talking Heads's _Remain In Light (vinyl)_: "The Great Curve" In-Reply-To: <83ee6q3j2t.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 05 Dec 2021 22:14:34 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:221721 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > How would that be different from what force-mode-line-update does now? > It sets the update_mode_line flag for the window's buffer, not just > for the window, and it also sets a flag to prevent redisplay > optimizations that could get in the way of the mode-line update. What > do you suggest to do instead, and why would that be useful? Somebody said earlier: > force-mode-line-update is a blunt weapon, and causes a much more > thorough redisplay than its name says. If this isn't accurate, then I guess there's nothing to do here. > The problem with the update_mode_line flags is that they are > indiscriminate: the mode line shows a lot of data, each one of it > changes at different frequencies and due to different triggers. If we > want a finer resolution there, we need to make these flags not just > simple booleans, but enumerations with several values, or maybe > bitmaps. Then redisplay_window could be smarter about redrawing parts > of the mode line. I think redrawing parts of the mode line would be more work than it's worth. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no