From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Po Lu via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#55208: 29.0.50; MS-Windows GUI selection dialogs and double-buffering Date: Sat, 07 May 2022 18:23:10 +0800 Message-ID: <87levd7ib5.fsf@yahoo.com> References: <83mtg15jg9.fsf@gnu.org> <87levkpwma.fsf@yahoo.com> <83czgpzt7n.fsf@gnu.org> <87tua17npc.fsf@yahoo.com> <838rrdzpdz.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmkp7l9l.fsf@yahoo.com> <834k21zmfc.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Po Lu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19059"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.91 (gnu/linux) Cc: 55208@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 07 12:24:13 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nnHbg-0004jN-2H for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 07 May 2022 12:24:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48302 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nnHbe-0003rU-KI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 07 May 2022 06:24:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50548) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nnHbW-0003rM-Pa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2022 06:24:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56664) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nnHbW-0000b0-H6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2022 06:24:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nnHbW-0000GV-DK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2022 06:24:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Po Lu Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 07 May 2022 10:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 55208 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 55208-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B55208.1651919008979 (code B ref 55208); Sat, 07 May 2022 10:24:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 55208) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 May 2022 10:23:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50561 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nnHay-0000Fj-M6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2022 06:23:28 -0400 Original-Received: from sonic308-56.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([66.163.187.31]:45937) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nnHaw-0000FW-V8 for 55208@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2022 06:23:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1651919001; bh=uuC8zIZEZP1pI3Z8bog0ZkvAMDhS2h8I6zWCSONwe7c=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=SlTqReGrPufFHJzezI4VdJdrHxpwLluhmH7Tw/ACsOTvAFrX0gspa3/YF/WmmNzfpe4nRccnXljBE7QzgX+Fm+zIBeWK6or7rl+8LiOl4A/IaHQGxYCzBPHjxB/rjyCxveH+zFiQ1IU1LcbouH4wu9WcyT4ke3PzcKZuxtXGyEthaKSvA6cUfrP269lM2bdTEPnZliBhIiPcgPJvP0M+AH3PkGjcAfhgUdoY1OLGBfPRlVj0vNz8DuOMIQBDPigW5cmPriHmibGyKiNiX0GcH+ppLJ4LPIijxcuqvAPfgrIpth8zDcG6Jmed9fzw3w5n8oU8X1BqMwj7D+gUUI1xdA== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1651919001; bh=/bT+QGiHAG4nGdRFO7Hx0R6w0WqtEV7bQDqfWErmn6C=; h=X-Sonic-MF:From:To:Subject:Date:From:Subject; b=Ex05ZFBsVgkiJ8qo/zei6yME0uGnkL18LZyoBfrW4qsfCrTBMrEtvfSCYyqpvNn2QGiUe88/UkksMlx/dGc/ORYfZcnZJX3LvmcuDjOkUjVBv91mO1/KQNpT1s9GlU/1YeLdAF+EAArRL5L1JrCdqvffV54FvDAWqTsf0d2nBNjA2dcVtOgaindZ0+cSxrywdmQk64MMSHwXgIv0RaxU+QS++jXMDl7FRau6+mWAstRv8C+q6dZ1cNhddXR/TBbDPEtC4pQlQUb3MiFsb2R1n/p0sTIfqC9YyKn48nCTKIsfgwA8VkZUUZ7hk+VR8LGMXqhDOriT8taWaro5xZCOfQ== X-YMail-OSG: QF6AcsMVM1k4S6G.wbsGl63XQ2aAS0RWVfdaC3QtrrAdiM.VuEf_krpnWKabmzN VYnhTYUPVC_DOK7x1meCIYVqMbnL8NjMVQIvadnoyd.DdulZ.zUaotsP84p2wzkmYPoJJaoLkU7_ StzRHzKZ.7Z0L.N0bvSZVrvTNhg33xuElsmzF.YOTzSyV3aTcMmIBtaypZSj32P9FGi95jHlo5R2 qVCthvWShk4PHjyCemhyeo83cWBUg5.bLv.HcsLPLb02a593GkPnKIACT6DprAZ8iUEr39tVnRPV X.p6T4P1K67q2tuesz8jKq9smwC72g6nkwq_K4JCD.PMaUXC6sBT.XiYkL8vkS1TkEpCDVxL4VYI ppjK3OVbrDaLM7TGeW7nB31x5U0O5BKOhzhEXGc5CpfLHNnJhGsp0IDkR2mb0u1Utm1RFxIojslk 8ANbD.ZEJGPrrgl4sgfCiI_iYhIX.ECvppHlVjWHJAw7U2gYJuafNhEG5mV7WPljVevvZxFJGWEe Z8J3K78p2qOO3NkWQQyrKGk6xXq8gFglaT7Yhio9hkQG7KnxWKzF0t7uzDHFR3YG2Q8tPQDLzasW U_T4Z0iIyXo_lt.fOAjAQ5UvAvN9AyZLEFJKuzIOSxbJL9ErxOGM_OsSMtvwG87SRYLpCjOoP1iB wZJIcxF1jlYYbr.V.iZQ3hkSWWdFdOzy4Cv0bVxr6e8Zkg3_1nL8BiGzlP3eUaeqzrqfQ9hLJ36o awh5KKHzm_w_DGhWJltY8vrzazbR9p5NWwZlm4qcGA9jU95YZtSz1THWtPQHW03NA5wKV.3JpEC8 st27fVtIDHJy8oEk4Wm5dqTxM.n6XLuXuVJ.dR7xxl X-Sonic-MF: Original-Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic308.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Sat, 7 May 2022 10:23:21 +0000 Original-Received: by hermes--canary-production-sg3-795d7b4d54-d9n2p (Yahoo Inc. Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 670e7779ea277beaab4606e5ed847ac4; Sat, 07 May 2022 10:23:15 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <834k21zmfc.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 07 May 2022 13:06:47 +0300") X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.20188 mail.backend.jedi.jws.acl:role.jedi.acl.token.atz.jws.hermes.yahoo X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:231568 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Thanks, the below seems to fix the problem here on XP. Does the patch > look reasonable, and if so, could you perhaps test it on some newer > version of Windows, to see that it doesn't cause any regressions > there? I don't have access to the Windows machine(s) at this time of day. The patch looks good to me (though I wonder what happens if a WM_PAINT message is received for a frame other than `w32_selection_dialog_open_frame'), and I will test it ASAP. Thanks.