From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#64735: 29.0.92; find invocations are ~15x slower because of ignores Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 11:51:27 +0000 Message-ID: <87lef9mqio.fsf@localhost> References: <1fd5e3ed-e1c3-5d6e-897f-1d5d55e379fa@gutov.dev> <87wmyupvlw.fsf@localhost> <5c4d9bea-3eb9-b262-138a-4ea0cb203436@gutov.dev> <87tttypp2e.fsf@localhost> <837cqu35lw.fsf@gnu.org> <87o7k6pmk3.fsf@localhost> <834jly351p.fsf@gnu.org> <87lefapkdx.fsf@localhost> <831qh230h5.fsf@gnu.org> <87wmyu8mi0.fsf@localhost> <83wmyu1l1k.fsf@gnu.org> <87fs5hemi1.fsf@gmx.de> <83edl11qzn.fsf@gnu.org> <874jlxebz5.fsf@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31179"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: dmitry@gutov.dev, Eli Zaretskii , 64735@debbugs.gnu.org, sbaugh@janestreet.com To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 21 13:52:26 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qMogM-0007s9-LR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 13:52:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qMog1-0003Ss-1o; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 07:52:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qMofy-0003SZ-OH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 07:52:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qMofy-0001aG-AB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 07:52:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qMofx-0006jo-UJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 07:52:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ihor Radchenko Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 11:52:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 64735 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 64735-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B64735.168994028825855 (code B ref 64735); Fri, 21 Jul 2023 11:52:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 64735) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2023 11:51:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60717 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qMofP-0006iv-W0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 07:51:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:54241) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qMofL-0006if-4Z for 64735@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 07:51:26 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 228CF240027 for <64735@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 13:51:16 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1689940277; bh=QC/THAI+BgEmnqDXoXb5znOC5j0bqRw3NkxABy+pxh8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=EE5HJTVIOknipwh0UI7mtTKZxZkORNVUkS/VftoMudXbXvtAO/QhLjBH16ejh3a5r jxgK13sOeJ06fJ3wic+pxUtCYRVQkwOvdz2wHgZTKncn2h2vwRDh0nOp+6KfVP7KRI C50anp3HwWo+OnLpxHOgHhaSf0TMBdkJpZ0TSvcUhLCJ7uZ+Z+ifq6AInpCTiNhDQh i3BGgbxjZU4V2xjc83wBthhv8CqommcApqz07IArpkz2MP0DL9ariBN0KuYGfPpnh3 AnJsl2q3TYcEAnj0ncbseLIWdcGULA8+wBCGL44t26Cg4xK+NAAsPvnEvGbCWV9XFu bJeqUyWATykqg== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4R6nvR6WYPz6tsg; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 13:51:15 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <874jlxebz5.fsf@gmx.de> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:265677 Archived-At: Michael Albinus writes: > And this is just the case to handle it in Lisp code, with > without-remote-files. According to the last Emacs Survey, more than 50% > of Emacs users don't use Tramp, never ever. But they must live with the > useless checks in file-name-handler-alist for Tramp. All of them would > profit, if they add (inhibit-remote-files) in their .emacs file. May tramp only set file-name-handler-alist when a tramp command is actually invoked? Or, alternatively, may we fence the regexp matches in `file-name-handler-alist' behind boolean switches? I examined what the actual handlers do, and I can see `jka-compr-inhibit', `epa-inhibit', `tramp-archive-enabled', and `tramp-mode' are used to force-execute the original handler. If we could make Emacs perform these checks earlier, the whole expensive regexp matching phase could be bypassed. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at