From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Pip Cet via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#72787: 31.0.50; Invalid describe-function completion candidates Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 11:15:44 +0000 Message-ID: <87le0m5fzc.fsf@protonmail.com> References: Reply-To: Pip Cet Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8811"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: 72787@debbugs.gnu.org, me@eshelyaron.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 24 13:16:19 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1shokl-0002Au-Qt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 24 Aug 2024 13:16:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1shokh-0002rW-IN; Sat, 24 Aug 2024 07:16:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1shokg-0002r8-2i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Aug 2024 07:16:14 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1shokf-0005vX-Py for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Aug 2024 07:16:13 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:To:Subject; bh=sws5Zmyx4NcYiKG9RAPK/2uHYsygdfyeD3miB4I6iyM=; b=HaeK9ux9WTZzqibF35RPYa33+XRyMwfMe7i9ci17ylHyAeIOYNLIgPdE530rkX95/P0JqMZepXfk3XlKbDsAGTNN0N3xWXTF+gjanev+/4FcIf6NazCtT6GZTNWYj3zDuuq/ytmi8c316NebzBCE2vrbh2xNrUhWNwgCuqoy5lw85QLQdGK3KyZL+EJLh+xPM2GkcCzQOlUwjz1uYW8HOz+aSgrRCdYZQ889MgEHMV2XGkWnYeJ+ymkKdzWW3eEyp0+lmme7YrWktyr64ZN/sPNNhF0X3KllMU4g6Cvl8AqgFfjNj7ij2o1sJwqLcwRtuL99PTOpWJitLyt+RMPy8Q==; Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sholS-0003ER-5e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Aug 2024 07:17:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Pip Cet Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 11:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 72787 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, 72787@debbugs.gnu.org, Eshel Yaron , Stefan Monnier Original-Received: via spool by 72787-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B72787.172449820812392 (code B ref 72787); Sat, 24 Aug 2024 11:17:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 72787) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Aug 2024 11:16:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40628 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sholD-0003Do-WB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Aug 2024 07:16:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-4322.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.22]:54057) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sholA-0003DK-MG for 72787@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Aug 2024 07:16:45 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1724498149; x=1724757349; bh=sws5Zmyx4NcYiKG9RAPK/2uHYsygdfyeD3miB4I6iyM=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=tLi+pERaR3PtWtZSQxuF5YmB2/wg2Ezhkg2d+Db/K5sm80ZhzS6bqrJpfVJg6BZVN mLcdcMAEczzB2nUM3aXo7hx1KEvnWxhViE3RGZ/bYSSxLgzZew2S8Y+XQ3P3MMMJ8E olZ392wodtudSu7EC8Vp99grhwvcBC3q4yIt5XxJ8SGWcpbs4yHa5BEiIHWzGS5gAI bEB8VPlTdGmrwMKrIFUDp6amiPkf4q1DzBN9lMDQXjYP/4jr9BFpfi0AuiG3wkalVb c3RY8/0GUtxJgI6bKwaW53PwvZKiZ+63MMdNocNobCRaPWjWaTl5h8ZlmNJEBDMwYg r0Pkpk5Qz83vw== In-Reply-To: Feedback-ID: 112775352:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: 4558568ee3937b469741931d87a34fff7bd27812 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:290661 Archived-At: "Eshel Yaron via \"Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text = editors\"" writes: > I've stumbled upon an issue with C-h f completions, both on the release > branch and on the master branch: > > 1. emacs -Q > 2. C-h f string-edit- TAB > > In Emacs 29, this pops up the *Completions* buffer, with 3 completion > candidates, string-edit-{abort,done,mode}. That's the expected > behavior, because "string-edit-" is not itself a valid candidate. > > However, in the release and master branches I get a minibuffer message > saying "Complete, but not unique". This is incorrect, because the input > is not complete. Another TAB pops up the *Completions* buffer, which is > now showing 4 candidates: the expected 3 plus "string-edit-" itself. > Typing RET exits the minibuffer without asking for confirmation, and > yields an error: "Symbol=E2=80=99s function definition is void: string-ed= it-". > > So it seems like "string-edit-" is being considered as a valid > completion candidate, while it shouldn't be. This appears to be caused by commit 45ae4de0e7ce99c88c62f940f605bca693b8e33f: * lisp/help-fns.el (help-definition-prefixes): Don't delete the hashtable Pip