From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9591: 24.0.50; buffer name completion Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:39:55 +0200 Message-ID: <87k48rdlc4.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87r5356aqu.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1317336069 22260 80.91.229.12 (29 Sep 2011 22:41:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 22:41:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, 9591@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 30 00:41:04 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R9PHs-0005wl-90 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:41:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37245 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9PHr-0004cx-Ga for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:41:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57576) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9PHp-0004ch-Ea for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:41:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9PHo-0005BY-Ei for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41706) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9PHo-0005BK-9x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:41:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R9PIo-0001v6-Pe for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:42:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 22:42:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9591 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9591-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9591.13173360947346 (code B ref 9591); Thu, 29 Sep 2011 22:42:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9591) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Sep 2011 22:41:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R9PIK-0001uM-0F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:41:34 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R9PIA-0001u1-7A for 9591@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:41:24 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=lenovo) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R9PH2-0004dj-18; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:40:12 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:02:25 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-Now-Playing: LCD Soundsystem's _London Sessions_: "Us V Them" X-MailScanner-ID: 1R9PH2-0004dj-18 MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1317940812.22976@IoYNIU4xwf1TKlO0e46cnA X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:42:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:51986 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > So I find it very handy to just say "C-x b *foo TAB" (or indeed just > "C-x b foo TAB" in Emacs-24) and see all buffers that contain "foo", > regardless of whether they're hidden or not. So it seems that both > behaviors are desirable and I'm not sure how to tell which to use > when. The suggestion is that if you type `C-x b SPC foo TAB', you will then see all buffers that have names containing the substring "foo", no matter whether they have a leading space or not. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/