From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12412: 24.2.50; `make distclean' does not remove .elc files Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 20:34:30 +0200 Message-ID: <87k3w0h0i1.fsf@altern.org> References: <87d31tlyf5.fsf@altern.org> <87har43fml.fsf@altern.org> <878vcg3e01.fsf@altern.org> <83mx0wwkud.fsf@gnu.org> <87wr00h2p5.fsf@altern.org> <83ipbkwhie.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1347388531 9108 80.91.229.3 (11 Sep 2012 18:35:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 18:35:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12412@debbugs.gnu.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 11 20:35:34 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TBVJ3-0006MH-9L for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 20:35:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47851 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBVIz-0006du-NG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:35:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43388) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBVIw-0006dp-9s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:35:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBVIv-0006qY-9O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:35:22 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45565) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBVIv-0006ps-5O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:35:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TBVJZ-0006kL-W6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:36:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Bastien Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 18:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12412 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 12412-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12412.134738851625881 (code B ref 12412); Tue, 11 Sep 2012 18:36:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12412) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2012 18:35:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55111 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TBVIq-0006jO-AO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:35:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com ([209.85.212.174]:39540) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TBVIo-0006jG-5s for 12412@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:35:15 -0400 Original-Received: by wibhr14 with SMTP id hr14so3280350wib.15 for <12412@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:34:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=mqsbxQjIXt26hDqoFkYRLvqcauIrBRn2CHfFPReHJZI=; b=G+RBBdxmMyL6Asxr5uRa7s579UPLe6KGyJJU0cRl0NahA5NqliI92VXVq+IjG0BqWe XSNBEI72JSrFqns8cGoMthqtarWYEEtkhVn749US2ClryD3XOYTcQ8MTxrdFgH19At/X UxfLtgMCKLeix5DD2o3qJ28KcY9NtLs64GSxt9eAizdsv4F8d+WOyisKYHv72aHi6XXm y+t7lbn0XS3COCr5mF4Ly3XT1zsSdL24ihjw8xyI32pluLWlPxdIy8NNg41MkEF5C/eD uBcwK+kZRxY4DfC4LRBfPH0FfYTq87RCnYXj34+SfHIbBxtuObDXLVqLY31Fwq2qAn6V NFcg== Original-Received: by 10.180.106.137 with SMTP id gu9mr26881585wib.20.1347388471870; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:34:31 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from myhost.localdomain (mar75-2-81-56-68-112.fbx.proxad.net. [81.56.68.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k2sm5689763wiz.7.2012.09.11.11.34.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:34:27 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by myhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 973BF89A2; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 20:34:30 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <83ipbkwhie.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 11 Sep 2012 21:18:01 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:64156 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > You mean, delete them, but not re-create them? Why would you need a > tree without *.elc files? When editing a .el file from the bzr branch, I sometimes byte-compile it to check compilation warnings. Since I prefer to keep the .el file in sync with the .elc file, I delete the newly created .elc file by hand. So in general, I prefer to work in a directory with no .elc file. But removing by hand is okay. -- Bastien