From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#3646: "bookmark format upgrade is incorrect" Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 00:05:40 -0500 Message-ID: <87k3v8uouz.fsf@floss.red-bean.com> References: <2A172ED84C2848FC9426043F282B4E08@us.oracle.com> Reply-To: Karl Fogel NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1349240820 9351 80.91.229.3 (3 Oct 2012 05:07:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 05:07:00 +0000 (UTC) To: 3646@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 03 07:07:05 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TJHAL-0002Eu-E7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Oct 2012 07:06:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37754 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TJHAF-00040o-Og for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Oct 2012 01:06:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44145) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TJHAC-00040P-AZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Oct 2012 01:06:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TJHAB-0002lg-2O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Oct 2012 01:06:28 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57074) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TJHAA-0002lc-Uw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Oct 2012 01:06:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TJHAk-0004R8-At for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Oct 2012 01:07:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <2A172ED84C2848FC9426043F282B4E08@us.oracle.com> Resent-From: Karl Fogel Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 05:07:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 3646 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 3646-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B3646.134924078416988 (code B ref 3646); Wed, 03 Oct 2012 05:07:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 3646) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Oct 2012 05:06:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38386 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TJHA7-0004Pw-J7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 Oct 2012 01:06:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ie0-f172.google.com ([209.85.223.172]:43730) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TJHA5-0004Po-R5 for 3646@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 Oct 2012 01:06:22 -0400 Original-Received: by iec9 with SMTP id 9so17298285iec.3 for <3646@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 22:05:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:subject:reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; bh=MZ9jA+xI1cpJWOFQUNuVa64lVv3xAt6wY2gPmXPFJPI=; b=IKHl05QW4FzTOztiSShSQuY1R5cFQo3GRzKsL4qhBU27D5saE+PjmFR+Gyut3k1GQ+ LTcrKrEyZM0Blk7WFoAPN6p/NNVFrorVubUyL5BZSU7A/44vcENh1OFrAwyyinZN5jQ0 Ui8VRcsu/8hlkN82jo0wyzFsYOpgENrj+xtTNCi4uf+O8Ua+ZEhyu8qAM35gNJORse+6 vLD63Ux7ldkb5lhTlIJ4aQklBWKg26pHXSIPkp/3aiT3/5W5r0wHxIsfXIq337d9s3ek WCdUaQ/0B3iP04RuV5YQNGkKN7WoYS1ElpQFYpO+JXGUfEqkrBgKeoeRHZCfPEj4Bkoj +ekw== Original-Received: by 10.50.152.132 with SMTP id uy4mr829184igb.3.1349240745241; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 22:05:45 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from floss.red-bean.com ([108.101.9.115]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d19sm10454064igp.6.2012.10.02.22.05.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 02 Oct 2012 22:05:43 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:65137 Archived-At: Hey, Drew. So, it's quite understandable you're confused -- the reason is that Debbugs apparently *dropped* the rest of the body of the mail in which I set this ticket to WONTFIX. That is, the first line of my mail was "tags 3646 wontfix" but then the rest of the mail said this: I'm tagging this as WONTFIX, because the cost/benefit ratio of fixing it is too low -- it's hard to fix, and there have been not many reports of it biting people in the wild. Of course I have no way to know the real cost of not fixing it; the bug tracker is an imperfect channel. I did spend a long time working on fixing that interim format upgrade path. It is clearly doable, but I didn't finish then and I've lost the head state (that was more than a year ago). If anyone has reason to think this bug is a major problem right now, please make a noise here. But apparently I was just supposed to know that Debbugs would not automatically attache my comments to the only bug mentioned in the control line, and that I had to CC 3646@ or 3646-foo@ explicitly. Hope the above explains it better. See also http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=12507#105 . Sigh :-). Best, -K