From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11563: 24.0.97; doc string of command `dired-insert-subdir' Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 20:07:57 -0800 Message-ID: <87k3d5exnm.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391919011 18741 80.91.229.3 (9 Feb 2014 04:10:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 04:10:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11563@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 09 05:10:19 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WCLii-0007Uv-I0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 05:10:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49093 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCLih-0007KE-QQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 23:10:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35334) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCLiZ-0007IH-Kk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 23:10:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCLiU-0001il-KW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 23:10:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44740) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCLiU-0001i8-Hh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 23:10:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCLiU-0008B8-3f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 23:10:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 04:10:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11563 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11563-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11563.139191896431372 (code B ref 11563); Sun, 09 Feb 2014 04:10:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11563) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2014 04:09:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58759 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCLhs-00089v-Dg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 23:09:24 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:37340) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCLhq-00089o-R2 for 11563@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 23:09:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WCLhb-00053O-Vj; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 05:09:08 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Sat, 26 May 2012 12:49:38 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1WCLhb-00053O-Vj MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1392523748.67535@PajQfnAf/l9mA6cxPu1AMg X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:85037 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: > But that begs the question of what those incompatibilities are. We > should tell users in the doc string just what they cannot do, instead > of making them discover this by trial and error. > > According to `dired-insert-subdir-validate' the incompatibilities are > for `F' and `b': a Dired buffer cannot have listings with and without > `F' or with and without `b'. This should be said in the doc string of > `dired-insert-subdir'. Actually, I can't parse what "with and without `F' or with and without `b'" is supposed to mean, either... -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/