From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11328: 24.1.50; Comment in `dired-copy-file-recursive' code Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 20:32:28 -0800 Message-ID: <87k3d4ewir.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: <0CC212AF2EA740A0B8FE5EEF91077A2D@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391920450 30347 80.91.229.3 (9 Feb 2014 04:34:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 04:34:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11328@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 09 05:34:16 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WCM5w-0000q8-CI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 05:34:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49174 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCM5v-00030w-OB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 23:34:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37663) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCM5n-00030h-SG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 23:34:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCM5i-0007Bl-Sw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 23:34:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44802) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCM5i-0007Bh-QX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 23:34:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCM5i-0002jc-8U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 23:34:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 04:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11328 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11328-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11328.139192043910503 (code B ref 11328); Sun, 09 Feb 2014 04:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11328) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2014 04:33:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58820 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCM5f-0002jL-DB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 23:33:59 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:51919) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCM5d-0002jD-LX for 11328@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 23:33:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WCM5O-0005L0-U4; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 05:33:43 +0100 In-Reply-To: <0CC212AF2EA740A0B8FE5EEF91077A2D@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:37:09 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1WCM5O-0005L0-U4 MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1392525223.79525@PpCHaY4x5GZSZwP2akEIJg X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:85044 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: > Just a nit. But if you are going to add unnecessary comments to the > code that describe only what everyone can see the code does, then at > least get them right. Otherwise you mislead readers. > > This comment is incorrect: "Not a directory". What is actually true at > that point is the following; Fixed on trunk. As for the "fluid variable" thing, I think that's probably left as is, or the code should be rewritten. Closing. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/