From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16253: 24.3.50; Irrelevant warnings from gnutls Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:42:32 -0500 Organization: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BE=D1=80_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=97=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87k3d38d0n.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87vbydjnzy.fsf@building.gnus.org> <87mwj7bbi7.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87y52di4gk.fsf@building.gnus.org> <87eh45i2q2.fsf@building.gnus.org> <87mwiqpr9q.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87r4829ziv.fsf@building.gnus.org> <87sirr8zmp.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87lhxjwu0z.fsf@building.gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1392028990 2883 80.91.229.3 (10 Feb 2014 10:43:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:43:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16253@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 10 11:43:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WCoKb-0006Px-AM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:43:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54773 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCoKa-00064D-S9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:43:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52625) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCoKS-00061n-FU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:43:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCoKM-0005ln-Nw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:43:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59515) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCoKM-0005la-Fo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:43:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCoKL-0006Wv-UQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:43:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ted Zlatanov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:43:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16253 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16253-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16253.139202896025057 (code B ref 16253); Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:43:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16253) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2014 10:42:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39177 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCoJw-0006Vz-PS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:42:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qc0-f170.google.com ([209.85.216.170]:64824) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCoJr-0006Vf-3M for 16253@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:42:35 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-qc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id e9so10254928qcy.15 for <16253@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 02:42:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lifelogs.com; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:mail-copies-to :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=vsJro4nwlsBj2aH94DLdb7WqZHp48DRF76HY1eSGpVo=; b=MwPhqlMvj2FPgd0h59O/Ww/cQ2coNDe2IUTndtnQAw+QT4+jSHiGQFwRRQwNG4TAhf U6LZWBlBsNg0f+G3n3xoSMos86a5c020MxHr9wespgK5reYstL7TIU1sQu2osm9NjE4n xFxJA2OuBzeho4yIWGNWqq2ubZ1ufDjafo1QY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:organization:references :mail-copies-to:gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=vsJro4nwlsBj2aH94DLdb7WqZHp48DRF76HY1eSGpVo=; b=gfifErpwhz8+v7EP88CcVRFjb2BgZpXkKQQv59GDZVjhhJjKP4meEUtjaO5puCcLNm vIaOjFpvvIeqcBUzjnZDYukWZbU1lQtbBlBh1b1v6XPlGq5wplLOMRv8Rsy2FmdXE53c EK/0VMhpfTfeJ9bjsMb4+EgwenWhpqLKWiqZjlgebh8McF/Lo8c9WYR9qBqb64hAxDyb 7eE3t5YQ/SCno/nOcl+i8wI8yy/wIYztoaHvHYgZhKBRFz/CtX+KiWi+8OA+ZcYj01EA QSva1+uNtbrhok18Qhl8U0TjtrehhvaEsG2eyUxtE7QdXb7PKilGXWI/BKKVSpOeH4vf rYsA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl89hWqO/Ap2lUnK2yMKv9uDspJEcVgaFtxFGNQLfLCgdoXQN3pYW9Z6HmDAUKmcyxuZOfC X-Received: by 10.224.122.20 with SMTP id j20mr46968354qar.82.1392028945448; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 02:42:25 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from flea (c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [98.229.61.72]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id r7sm23169230qgr.17.2014.02.10.02.42.23 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 10 Feb 2014 02:42:24 -0800 (PST) X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: <87lhxjwu0z.fsf@building.gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 09 Feb 2014 19:01:16 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:85255 Archived-At: On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 19:01:16 -0800 Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: LI> Ted Zlatanov writes: >> OK. I will log them to a special " *TLS errors*" buffer. That's a good >> balance. LI> Yeah, that would be good. And perhaps limit the size of the buffer. It rarely gets annoyingly big, but OK... 50K messages? >> Doing that from C is not obvious, compared to the standard `message' >> function. Any hints? Should I just call `Fget-buffer-create' and >> call functions to append to the returned buffer Lisp_Object, or is there >> a magical equivalent? LI> I just had a look at message_dolog (which puts data into the *Messages* LI> buffer). It didn't look pretty... Is all that really necessary? Not for my usage, definitely. I can call the usual ELisp functions, I just want to know if there's a convenient C shortcut. >> Also, I think we should add that buffer, plus the version of GnuTLS and >> the priority string, to bug reports. WDYT? LI> For all Emacs bug reports? Hm... Yes, if GnuTLS is enabled. We already sent the messages (from *Messages*) and the default is not very verbose. Ted