From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25287: 25.1; [WISH] shr-rescale-image: pass window size externally Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 16:37:24 +0100 Message-ID: <87k29obf0r.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87y3z0nhxl.fsf@umons.ac.be> <87a8bgvwes.fsf@gnus.org> <87eg0srnep.fsf@umons.ac.be> <8760m4vux8.fsf@gnus.org> <87d1gcrmg5.fsf@umons.ac.be> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1496093551 27032 195.159.176.226 (29 May 2017 21:32:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 21:32:31 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 25287@debbugs.gnu.org, djcb@djcbsoftware.nl To: Christophe Troestler Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 21 16:38:19 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cUxjz-00070M-Nv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 16:38:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60487 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cUxk4-0000kD-Nh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 10:38:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37436) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cUxjx-0000k5-Jh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 10:38:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cUxju-000522-FX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 10:38:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:39432) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cUxju-00051q-Cb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 10:38:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cUxju-000320-1i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 10:38:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 15:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25287 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25287-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25287.148501305811621 (code B ref 25287); Sat, 21 Jan 2017 15:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25287) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jan 2017 15:37:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37631 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cUxjW-00031N-3O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 10:37:38 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:53363) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cUxjU-00031B-Gb for 25287@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 10:37:37 -0500 Original-Received: from 2.150.49.21.tmi.telenormobil.no ([2.150.49.21] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cUxjP-0001rv-2F; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 16:37:33 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87d1gcrmg5.fsf@umons.ac.be> (Christophe Troestler's message of "Wed, 28 Dec 2016 18:30:02 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:133013 Christophe Troestler writes: >> Couldn't mu4e just switch to the correct buffer first and then the >> scaling would work automatically? > > The author (added to CC) seems to imply that it is hard > . Maybe the problem is that > this buffer contains many parts, each with its own rendering. OK, I have to objection to adding an optional target-width/target-height pair of parameters to `shr-rescale-image'. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no