From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#30757: Better manipulation (suppressing, examining type) of warnings from *Warnings* buffer Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 12:04:31 +0100 Message-ID: <87k1uhk11c.fsf@gmail.com> References: <877eql1ld0.fsf@gmail.com> <871sgtnxth.fsf@gmail.com> <87woylminv.fsf@gmail.com> <873719kzyh.fsf@gmail.com> <83zi3husrr.fsf@gnu.org> <87vae5jikg.fsf@gmail.com> <87vae4zknx.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1520852599 26787 195.159.176.226 (12 Mar 2018 11:03:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 11:03:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 30757@debbugs.gnu.org To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 12 12:03:14 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1evLEU-0006nN-Vw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 12:03:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57759 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1evLGX-0005mO-W2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 07:05:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46821) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1evLGO-0005l9-MG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 07:05:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1evLGI-0000ZM-Nu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 07:05:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48129) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1evLGI-0000Yr-L0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 07:05:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1evLGH-00071F-Jd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 07:05:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Pluim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 11:05:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 30757 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 30757-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B30757.152085268226948 (code B ref 30757); Mon, 12 Mar 2018 11:05:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 30757) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Mar 2018 11:04:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56026 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1evLFx-00070a-Pp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 07:04:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr0-f169.google.com ([209.85.128.169]:40979) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1evLFw-00070M-4B for 30757@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 07:04:40 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr0-f169.google.com with SMTP id f14so15204552wre.8 for <30757@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 04:04:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:mail-copies-to:gmane-reply-to-list :date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version; bh=BzSfds4s2XAOO1oLqhTFEjZdA+7fliDrRMLoolml7DI=; b=NYl9Lyvmc+JQNBLpiP/R/XTAct3KF77hcg5jKcFrZAEgD6tMkIYcgqYilE+xPt6Biz Bx0i9kEoAhMdgfqDgNiZ3cuYfdbUgWbVs2d3PNV0Hd2n/wh8FsEdtv3fGto1ZZgNL3gt koCwqeJA7KeCqPdpolIurEauCCPT0ZR1eeKt01cxgcYBdcZTCHFIZbYx4VkNxvvXJHvl cXQ1eMN81+AasCTJmyDeUqy/n5YFcrffN4DW9ihjhtjuVHMZBgXO433FmU60CO3z1YEL 3UQ3t2DK6LwRpY21PbLwdoij7++wMxVG/GC0xTQguIg+Lt3nDgoD1Obd5WbzHAEMIrvJ 6BCQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:mail-copies-to :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version; bh=BzSfds4s2XAOO1oLqhTFEjZdA+7fliDrRMLoolml7DI=; b=NqYkVz+ZTrNW2+kebGsoK8MTBEo816SdMAHx9i0FbkM28l5W6B9G7Y4ucJuWw1S1q/ /CEMrikwDT9IHIgXqSdcIOKm0eQklozeNzd2IuH1tIz62Lc59kniyizTINV6HAm73wAr wDoOMylI9d693ZoCWdkvwwpbJhT3eYNe+ELVbTfmbCdhHB3TagKpVRT2U1lFlq4aTYUm ACuDqleOKrr1LgJG7VQ/M7gogANGWXXPhCYKx7fOkMVBtQd9TsrR4xUwJeBosVRwRR35 MFKuAItFHbsVl8TTOGJVriJnTTapOYDFUfYloNn+rVuhjW13h8jOfoWFVqx0XAX6/TAw CUuA== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7Ez7BDwYc7+UmsbGUt6/nu58X/fKXhg1bom4Wur4qu0viZMn2OU hd1PCWqVUFw/wCgOFsTgcCWSdxao X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELs6z9ED41Vvwfi9XqhrYewofy0JB/LS8Uq6n1WKu6EqJXiREzeciu9bxKckJZD4Bo/S5jPplQ== X-Received: by 10.223.147.103 with SMTP id 94mr315358wro.240.1520852673945; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 04:04:33 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rpluim-ubuntu ([149.5.228.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 8sm6603272wmf.13.2018.03.12.04.04.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Mar 2018 04:04:33 -0700 (PDT) Mail-Copies-To: never Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: <87vae4zknx.fsf@gmail.com> (Noam Postavsky's message of "Fri, 09 Mar 2018 22:14:42 -0500") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:144149 Archived-At: Noam Postavsky writes: > Robert Pluim writes: > >> Yes. I'm stuck between being precise but verbose, and more general and >> succinct, and expressing the permanence of the resulting change. I've >> make another attempt, although I'm still not entirely happy with it, >> especially since the button texts are now quite long (I thought about >> using the verb 'hide', but that's not accurate either). > > Perhaps taking Drew's suggestion to popup a *Help* window would give > more room to be descriptive? It would, but I thought the target user here was someone who doesn't necessarily know much about how to configure stuff in Emacs, but just wants to disable an annoying warning, so a long verbose detailed *Help* window might be counter-productive. Robert