From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tino Calancha Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#31772: 26.1; (thing-at-point 'list) regression Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 00:21:35 +0900 Message-ID: <87k1r6acqo.fsf@gmail.com> References: <838t7msmy1.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1528644012 26449 195.159.176.226 (10 Jun 2018 15:20:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2018 15:20:12 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 31772@debbugs.gnu.org, tino.calancha@gmail.com, Noam Postavsky , Dmitry Gutov , Leo Liu To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 10 17:20:08 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fS28V-0006lQ-7R for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2018 17:20:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44421 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fS2Ac-0002eM-AI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2018 11:22:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40726) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fS2AP-0002cl-Np for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2018 11:22:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fS2AM-00068J-IV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2018 11:22:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34543) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fS2AM-00068F-Dx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2018 11:22:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fS2AM-0004xd-7X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2018 11:22:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Tino Calancha Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2018 15:22:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31772 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 31772-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31772.152864411219048 (code B ref 31772); Sun, 10 Jun 2018 15:22:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 31772) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jun 2018 15:21:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42440 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fS2AB-0004xA-MD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2018 11:21:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pl0-f52.google.com ([209.85.160.52]:40283) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fS2AA-0004ww-9u for 31772@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2018 11:21:50 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pl0-f52.google.com with SMTP id t12-v6so10869087plo.7 for <31772@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 10 Jun 2018 08:21:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=wcEqlZHobZ4JbVxi3ov5Jn7g9JktPJe8Zq+ykn3RXE4=; b=fW8CRiYVAd5JvkIvHzcbNTvyDgyCm8gzs5xja8IJr78SCpHEOjs0tPtWcy5Mx3+QDs YeGP+OQGPBUO1wYNYHbAkIo9xElvkKelOPZQYXodX+UyguBBiwukI5pItGdAffG2r0hn xL1uRSo1vly2mWFSek489ss5wQZSmrBBZ61MXrqWnQov4TomJ9+aWKJy+Ibmm9wTiNsR t6x0V3jo44KRcEAnJyHY/pvVjyqEcF/pe9HnKvB5QC5O6qrCLakevoGMj1K9RXABzeHn lEm1FQDMPp+kaR7L5IKuimPoMA0qwc456KiaCISi3ULYIOHIlN5Gn46UHHKIM6forXEw b1Og== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=wcEqlZHobZ4JbVxi3ov5Jn7g9JktPJe8Zq+ykn3RXE4=; b=uW1Ay9cJDbFGMdpFbUOQalOQWVNyKx2ju8q8xyBCgmmwreMR7908xM8chf6FgvJSf8 6rYkc/k8gS7ilW4+6W3w4zNORr3E53cQwexMHpWHcMK3VuEoIad5gyOWxVYR1z2ga/ra htDhz+I/JIOFPHRAoblnrevUGs/Eo2VdJEFdSTj93uuf86wYI2+I9cbnBffzdt3GbuvX dBOKQ3FPA5HuY6kZdhTy2BzwyV2qXzszoUeiBFsWqdIyNlxt7rd0FLKp5Dq/HeqHzZ9a h87lORCfd92oFTv/O7EwlfetPP7/wcd/ozBoZFtLFmJWXnZFRpoUYv91t144hnoJE0D0 l3rg== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E0W1gC8aX9EKCt+81KR5Do97JLk5PiszdvgRMhWNN+OEcdAsWLU wSyuQzYXYPH7VuoGo7JVy0U= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKJVGMJtaY2m+cCs51rIwwIdkIn+YYpRTTGK+SeU8j2nN5qbjdhAlANe14N8hcBqGVAmEc8Zog== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7685:: with SMTP id m5-v6mr14856283pll.76.1528644104519; Sun, 10 Jun 2018 08:21:44 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from calancha-pc (228.225.128.101.dy.bbexcite.jp. [101.128.225.228]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x3-v6sm58246916pfm.2.2018.06.10.08.21.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 10 Jun 2018 08:21:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <838t7msmy1.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 10 Jun 2018 18:03:50 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:147262 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Due to change >> >> commit 76e297c15f6312a83599aab216be0396e9aac5c5 >> Author: Tino Calancha >> Date: Thu Nov 3 20:33:19 2016 +0900 >> >> (thing-at-point 'list) no longer works in comments; always return nil. > > Should it? AFACS, in Emacs 25 the above returned nonsensical values > when invoked inside Lisp comments. [CC the relevant thingatpt experts] Initially I thought that; after discuss with Emacs colleages I changed my mine. If you are in a buffer in emacs-lisp-mode, I just see one list of length 3 in the following line: ("foo" "(bar)" "baz") "(bar)" is a string. If we comment the line, then there is no list at all; just a comment. That is tested in thingatpt-tests.el (thing-at-point-bug24627). You could change to fundamental-mode, then you would get again the full list: because the line is not commented anymore. To me this behaviour has sense, and it's predictible. Maybe others disagree. PD: I must admit I am a bit worry everytime we start discussing about this lib... :-S