From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36839: 26.1: unique frame names Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 19:43:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87k1c0ybx0.fsf@igel.home> References: <20190729161606.fyjwowadnuwe27zd@E15-2016.optimum.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="81992"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2.90 (gnu/linux) Cc: 36839@debbugs.gnu.org To: Boruch Baum Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 29 19:44:10 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hs9gw-000LCO-B6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 19:44:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55370 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hs9gu-0001Wx-ML for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 13:44:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44566) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hs9gp-0001Wf-LK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 13:44:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hs9go-0004CX-LR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 13:44:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40231) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hs9go-0004BW-CJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 13:44:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hs9go-0001hN-5K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 13:44:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andreas Schwab Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 17:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36839 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 36839-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36839.15644221926442 (code B ref 36839); Mon, 29 Jul 2019 17:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36839) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jul 2019 17:43:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49052 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hs9fz-0001fq-Vh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 13:43:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:36890) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hs9fy-0001fh-OU for 36839@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 13:43:11 -0400 Original-Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45y6V54SRCz1rK4R; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 19:43:09 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45y6V52zgcz1qqkK; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 19:43:09 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Original-Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KNhBmiz0fUsi; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 19:43:07 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: 3c1Q0uPqacbrWicK3OaZCfm9jDJIU3rG1/jj2JFRQZ0zLtLbul9iwevIG3zCVayA Original-Received: from igel.home (ppp-46-244-175-130.dynamic.mnet-online.de [46.244.175.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 19:43:07 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 10ADD2C12AB; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 19:43:07 +0200 (CEST) X-Yow: My haircut is totally traditional! In-Reply-To: <20190729161606.fyjwowadnuwe27zd@E15-2016.optimum.net> (Boruch Baum's message of "Mon, 29 Jul 2019 12:16:06 -0400") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:164055 Archived-At: On Jul 29 2019, Boruch Baum wrote: > My expectation is that emacs should by default create frames with unique > names, similar to how it uniquely names buffers, by appending a number > to what would otherwise be a duplicate name. There is nothing wrong with having duplicate frame names. The name is used for looking up X resources, but otherwise it is for information only. A frame doesn't need to have a name. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."