From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n_?= =?UTF-8?Q?N=C4=9Bmec?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#3179: Entering Chinese "zero": add U+3007 Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 14:00:35 +0200 Message-ID: <87k196b4m4.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87r5z8vgp1.fsf_-_@jidanni.org> <87my9wvf0r.fsf@jidanni.org> <87eezga3oy.fsf@gnus.org> <87y2xnb72s.fsf@gmail.com> <87r23fw1jk.fsf@gnus.org> <87tv8bawfr.fsf@gmail.com> <87pnizt59w.fsf@gnus.org> <87o8yjavbc.fsf@gmail.com> <874l0bt4h6.fsf@gnus.org> <83o8yih1ak.fsf@gnu.org> <87wod6pg6n.fsf@gnus.org> <837e56gwuw.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="139020"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Notmuch/0.29.1 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/27.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: 3179@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 15 14:01:12 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iKLVo-000a3w-4S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 14:01:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42822 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iKLVm-0004Gs-NT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 08:01:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34846) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iKLVf-0004EB-Qy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 08:01:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iKLVe-0004R1-NU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 08:01:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34009) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iKLVe-0004Qr-Jk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 08:01:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iKLVe-0001Qt-GO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 08:01:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n_?= =?UTF-8?Q?N=C4=9Bmec?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 12:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 3179 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 3179-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B3179.15711408465476 (code B ref 3179); Tue, 15 Oct 2019 12:01:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 3179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Oct 2019 12:00:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42830 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iKLVN-0001QF-OD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 08:00:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-f48.google.com ([209.85.128.48]:51496) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iKLVL-0001Q0-7Y for 3179@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 08:00:43 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-f48.google.com with SMTP id 7so20585457wme.1 for <3179@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 05:00:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nz3NRDsVYfpANN8A9ohyzYcQXHBvFHCzx6q5NK5MJSY=; b=VWEHk1RagvdhXO9cvtCTHxRuBF+xI+FHnkzjGhKARBxUXYAsX22vA9g24G2wNd49PH NqEEXoOCrYBArZEyCDodEEeU/eL4InRlkIROxbGf0ZxIVf+fXeBC1UiINpc1ZFjhegWq NLfXk+qpYz/vw1/NpY1x+++2x3/LAp4EmrPktz8Cm4n3Eq2mrz8HjYzUELHuLMAZIvqP R9FcNm+ku+/PXuLZbnGixqWsPjDJOnYZAAuvfkMnl3zLllqViWFLHwCxssmE9bSVLIMG Oz816DPiaZ1fVF5kVMXKQB3NanqaOePukbgMFGG5pSaWXmr1nK5JXFgA70Jfo13UnPyf pSUg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nz3NRDsVYfpANN8A9ohyzYcQXHBvFHCzx6q5NK5MJSY=; b=AQ21IcCs5rzoZCwGnSAiMABjEARFz1pCjxk92AhtzQFkoQz+uMt3mwA4KFSaRg/Gm+ StcOSoni2IDBd99zGgcIfzHt7lSFLMESIjl3dG93k2MMEt+VnL5Ld08+Cs59ukU8VKFq 3F+zF21VXKlVrsanX9TPFq1DQhOrBi5uv1fI3gWcxefpidyVVLrJN9bSPrApewfJLhw9 XbfUuN+ucKxWLQPZ1n+sYhpETCNGtKRNqJvINgnzuFunTQPGhii8ppIkeRmtI9zULAU1 ZuN8JlD9lHQWX+Ju1pqMUx8oWf3vz0wqLHcq8hpZ6iUlb/GTXuzMrFoyUXcy77oeWey8 W++Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXPMlH35qCE5Ph+kRkSymMVc548XRFZwc12gO8v+x3lVb9ZIPlI ECAQBEp6fkO2XUcnrw6bYnE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqypjDOGy0Aw+wE8upU7ZbWCDqTItf9NMHlFDPc+d1L+6f+n1JZbXDvCYuYv6t52XsSSrGxKqg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:2d54:: with SMTP id t81mr20100319wmt.167.1571140837305; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 05:00:37 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([185.112.167.114]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d4sm21114369wrq.22.2019.10.15.05.00.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 15 Oct 2019 05:00:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <837e56gwuw.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:169377 Archived-At: On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 12:51:35 +0300 Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Ming Hua gave no reasoning, and =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n said U+3007 is the = standard way > to write ideographic zero. But why should we assume the intent here > was to use the ideographic zero? The intent (to write ideographic zero, not white circle) is quite clear, because that's what the key "ling2" means in Mandarin. As is usually the case in Chinese, ling2 can also mean a lot of other things, but white circle is not one of them. You can check with any Chinese or Japanese input method what suggestion you get for that key (in Japanese that'd be =E3=82=8C=E3=81=84/rei). I, for= example, use fcitx with mozc for Japanese and sunpinyin for Chinese, both of which do the right thing. (I don't normally use Emacs input methods for CJK languages, I find quail too limited for those and I suspect the same will be the case for other serious users, which might also be the reason for the lack of previous feedback.) That said, by all means, do check with Handa-san, I'm kind of curious myself. --=20 =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n