From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?K=C3=A9vin?= Le Gouguec Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48545: 28.0.50; `icomplete-vertical-mode` does not support the `group-function` Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 21:36:47 +0200 Message-ID: <87k0khteeo.fsf@gmail.com> References: <10d162d5-2cd6-dd87-3289-a0187dfbf51f@daniel-mendler.de> <871r6sw9iz.fsf@gmail.com> <87a6lfnld0.fsf@gmail.com> <87eearulft.fsf@gmail.com> <871r6pr8bk.fsf@gmail.com> <87zgtdd2yi.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13969"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Daniel Mendler , Gregory Heytings , 48545@debbugs.gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov To: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 19 21:37:11 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mGnqg-0003PG-RY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 21:37:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44798 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mGnqf-0000IT-0r for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 15:37:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50252) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mGnqZ-0000IJ-79 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 15:37:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49272) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mGnqX-0007YH-V4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 15:37:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mGnqX-0003uu-QX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 15:37:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <10d162d5-2cd6-dd87-3289-a0187dfbf51f@daniel-mendler.de> Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?K=C3=A9vin?= Le Gouguec Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 19:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48545 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 48545-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48545.162940181815045 (code B ref 48545); Thu, 19 Aug 2021 19:37:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48545) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Aug 2021 19:36:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60818 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mGnqT-0003ub-O0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 15:36:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f48.google.com ([209.85.221.48]:46758) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mGnqQ-0003uM-U4 for 48545@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 15:36:55 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f48.google.com with SMTP id f5so10643322wrm.13 for <48545@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 12:36:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=B5hCNHYRO6EnGaBf3PL6ho6RYKu7PDVse1W1wLXbWvg=; b=oXdKHgLitD5EpZg4KHYuz35hY6PfK+2EEg1VXimRoGL+ZUSGPzRxnOlCBGgVT/Rd6X AqvF5zkz/vdctdbAPAki1OkQEtUxy8maoO0i7I0tlaQgiEKe/9eXZumyYV+2tDhzDvMb A0eqppUV1SGFWXnm0rePTwnI38KVq7+Xrc9uvWnDA2Q5LERkiFSi91SXyNlMV2UNXUFK 0yxQ0kGmmcrJVYwULBMubwO2yrmzZnhYXSvxSOUPHnpXSSb7bGjc7WWZlxg57zIM+CN/ cEeAyxLvHlzSeoTB7+X2ubNbRzwQkQ98SNwzvkU/xc34yLe1bmoH+ZWLxOqhFst2oZUo YNeA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=B5hCNHYRO6EnGaBf3PL6ho6RYKu7PDVse1W1wLXbWvg=; b=D9tfPLOLCSZYIWhxtT1p7wD2ZRZqKfMirJ8QehxZ09blXt1uDh8P3yG7HQQ3ZAEnM7 berffrEGRyvDUkX4La9/YsXxtyQZzKlACpLSZ0w57ECZEhlsfhv+r187mkfdTYlqxqUp frzDZYMO7fhvuHtc+zBED4K7jd1bP+ZswbZ3Y+HNV4yRwCneJFRs3wu2rr1mQCkqv7Pt eeP6j6CN4WZckbdnt3bmNEy+ZgWoANU3K1uujR0MHBD8NoLjow6xTxDuubp5LIis4kIy 2ceS3gZ0FqDFHXHV1+lznlv3G6rvDCUiCHK1y88b9QRsucqj2AmZ9edGu8CBV2Ic8AoT fMqg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Vw8g7da36MQ/C5DOyAR8ikkB+HQnicFCU3r8pBel5sbCW6Wlq luzyAchQM1CUT3NxXT31ruk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyDMGUR8s34x4aGUyeOTiKravqUaEqec21bH/rEVXaaVv6sa0/04jcgiCcMuB2+vzARGh6z1w== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4fc9:: with SMTP id h9mr5866379wrw.2.1629401808985; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 12:36:48 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from hirondell (static-136-181-62-95.ipcom.comunitel.net. [95.62.181.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h126sm8770579wmh.1.2021.08.19.12.36.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 19 Aug 2021 12:36:48 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:212237 Archived-At: Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora writes: > FWIW (I didn't take the time to understand the ins and outs of the > completion system nor the changes that are being made; sorry about > that),=20 > > Don't beat yourself over it, it's not an easy or pleasent thing to unders= tand. (It's not for lack of trying either *cough*bug#40152*cough*) > with this tentative patch, Icomplete seems to honour > read-char-by-name-sort. With icomplete enabled and > read-char-by-name-sort set to 'code, try > > C-x 8 RET CLOCK FACE > > - with the current master branch, the completions are sorted > alphabetically, > - with the tentative patch applied, the completions are sorted by code > point. > > Yes I think that's the idea. But do you think that's good or bad? Apologies, my message was fairly clinical and lacked emphasis. Icomplete heeding read-char-by-name-sort? Yes please! =F0=9F=91=8D for th= is tentative patch. > This seems to compose well with completions-group AFAICT (see e.g. C-x 8 > RET ROMAN). > > This is good, right? Yes, also good =F0=9F=91=8D