From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sean Whitton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#53004: NonGNU ELPA: paredit only available in -devel archive Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2022 12:30:12 -0700 Message-ID: <87k0ffuwmz.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25545"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Notmuch/0.31.4 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/29.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) To: Stefan Kangas , 53004@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 04 20:31:23 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n4pWj-0006S1-8y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2022 20:31:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53968 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n4pWh-0002or-Pc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2022 14:31:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33474) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n4pWS-0002ng-GV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2022 14:31:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55441) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n4pWQ-0002BD-I1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2022 14:31:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n4pWQ-0004zc-7u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2022 14:31:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Sean Whitton Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2022 19:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 53004 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 53004-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B53004.164132462719143 (code B ref 53004); Tue, 04 Jan 2022 19:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 53004) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jan 2022 19:30:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38754 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n4pVm-0004yd-Qm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2022 14:30:27 -0500 Original-Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:59131) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n4pVj-0004yO-Fw for 53004@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2022 14:30:21 -0500 Original-Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 352D55C020B; Tue, 4 Jan 2022 14:30:14 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 04 Jan 2022 14:30:14 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=spwhitton.name; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=fm2; bh=LcBehGoyYdrwLY9YEHKnRPxs9G TZ2Uy2LGdDwTm+MXo=; b=lK8z8YEky+/Tm8ndLcwa7jemdjL00eRdcnTsVW2mjh uBRCKMgYHPexrKmMBmv5QKW7N4KrdGWEGdN1wXNy/51biofu7tfCuB3IxTPP1S3i 2InPBmFFpNfO+sz0STo+JJESigoRRKafEMJ8nom2axkgXd+7MlmiD8IToQ0EYorN 0HtEAVKSa+DZlwrjwSQO/HHXSL+t+N9ATigaUdeZbZaQJt2s/kzYO3l54NX1FWS/ dAK8SP0w0o/P++D9TIeplb869ke+eA0O7kZ0T6jdk4r1FS3UdBwGnWnl61Vh4fdw 65ngZJ+C8o3wSs+OEZhQVSlwJWWrMk0wl79pa6CjqrnA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=LcBehG oyYdrwLY9YEHKnRPxs9GTZ2Uy2LGdDwTm+MXo=; b=Rz654F2KcKEJYv5F9+XZ3A J4dVtRXt12CIqoSfORRF0IFELO1rnaLDt5uVJPyQeBxKUkZosUvEsvVyGbm6B1Lo jPFG9QDKDld+/W3ZjmMgWzcrakY6O0RVgEpAVQOxqlksEny9BDzgQozrSyqww53T edaYpIg904kyEFVw+537jQeHiIZJDFntq/lJ0k6RXLTnSWyhkPNKScy/CHOISUoH JuaB3YuPSGzVyHkAM6vi/qTD6ljmBLCn4HxaXiGaz6mqBnjCs3mHlyqfj8ibYDaX MsHkGv+AidZau1YWTM0lRYbjBSYjXKTVcfXtPXV/jj1iRgJqZlDCe3iAda+pbZ4Q == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrudeffedguddviecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffujghffgffkfggtgesthdttddttdertdenucfhrhhomhepufgvrghn ucghhhhithhtohhnuceoshhpfihhihhtthhonhesshhpfihhihhtthhonhdrnhgrmhgvqe enucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedvieelffffgeelfeekveelfeelhffgffffledvhfekteeu tdelvddvffejtdekteenucffohhmrghinhepmhhumhgslhgvrdhnvghtpdhnohhnghhnuh drohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhm pehsphifhhhithhtohhnsehsphifhhhithhtohhnrdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 4 Jan 2022 14:30:13 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: by melete.silentflame.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DF3B97F954E; Tue, 4 Jan 2022 12:30:12 -0700 (MST) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:223655 Archived-At: Hello Stefan, On Tue 04 Jan 2022 at 09:10AM -05, Stefan Kangas wrote: > In elpa-packages, we have: > > ("paredit" :url "https://mumble.net/~campbell/git/paredit.git" > :ignored-files ("check.sh" "genhtml.sh" "test.el")) > > But I can't find it on: > > http://elpa.nongnu.org/nongnu/ > > However, it is available here: > > https://elpa.nongnu.org/nongnu-devel/ > > I guess this has to do with the version number, which is "25beta". I'm > not sure why it is a beta, as I've been using it for 10+ years with no > issues whatsoever. > > Perhaps we should gently ask the developer to bump it to some non-beta > version number, or alternatively accept that as a full release in this > case? I was in touch with upstream recently about a bug. I think that 25 might be forthcoming. So perhaps wait and see a bit? -- Sean Whitton