From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#51733: 27.1; Detect impossible email addresses better Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 15:06:53 +0100 Message-ID: <87k0ev7rb6.fsf@igel.home> References: <87czn8etuz.7.fsf@jidanni.org> <87sftm5lxc.fsf@gnus.org> <835yqiwa87.fsf@gnu.org> <87ee565l4d.fsf@gnus.org> <875yqi5kk7.fsf@gnus.org> <83zgnuuucu.fsf@gnu.org> <83r196uqni.fsf@gnu.org> <87sftm3ye5.fsf@gnus.org> <87iluh4ety.fsf@gnus.org> <87ee55474p.fsf@gnus.org> <87a6ft46mr.fsf@gnus.org> <874k6146ay.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgnt2qz9.fsf@gnus.org> <87v8yh2ot4.fsf@gnus.org> <87r1952omd.fsf@gnus.org> <831r14vq70.fsf@gnu.org> <8735lkdqll.fsf@gnus.org> <834k60t03u.fsf@gnu.org> <87h79zdgxe.fsf@gnus.org> <87o8477spw.fsf@igel.home> <87r193akvf.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8014"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.91 (gnu/linux) Cc: 51733@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 19 15:13:15 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nABi7-0001uD-9X for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 15:13:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36560 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nABi6-0005y0-1V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 09:13:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42282) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nABc7-0007Eo-8G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 09:07:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60292) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nABc6-0002vC-Rm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 09:07:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nABc6-00031G-Ey; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 09:07:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andreas Schwab Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 14:07:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51733 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus Original-Received: via spool by 51733-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51733.164260121911596 (code B ref 51733); Wed, 19 Jan 2022 14:07:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 51733) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jan 2022 14:06:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53195 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nABc3-00030x-28 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 09:06:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:35362) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nABbz-00030o-Ss for 51733@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 09:06:57 -0500 Original-Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Jf6rt6By9z1qwdP; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 15:06:54 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Jf6rt4XT3z1qqkG; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 15:06:54 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Original-Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UkFxiCyoKpsU; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 15:06:53 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: Pckc7ZmhC5TUA6itqiODKiucDoP8Be7k4yCQMReslt9gSz5NckPLZXH8wdfos4vP Original-Received: from igel.home (ppp-46-244-165-91.dynamic.mnet-online.de [46.244.165.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 15:06:53 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4EE392C3737; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 15:06:53 +0100 (CET) X-Yow: Now my EMOTIONAL RESOURCES are heavily committed to 23% of the SMELTING and REFINING industry of the state of NEVADA!! In-Reply-To: <87r193akvf.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 19 Jan 2022 14:57:40 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:224591 Archived-At: On Jan 19 2022, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Andreas Schwab writes: > >> I don't think it makes sense to run the textsec check on the encoded >> address, since that will always be ASCII-only. > > We decode the header after parsing it (and before doing the textsec > tests). The why not allow to run the textsec on the decoded header directly? If you have to encode it first you have to do DWIM parsing anyway. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."