From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tyler Grinn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#57140: New user option mouse-wheel-text-scale-buffer Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 15:24:33 -0400 Message-ID: <87k07er3bi.fsf@gmail.com> References: <871qtnudsc.fsf@gmail.com> <878rnuudaw.fsf@gmail.com> <83o7wqq58o.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmh6st14.fsf@gmail.com> <83k07epy3w.fsf@gnu.org> <87a68asojm.fsf@gmail.com> <834jyipuoq.fsf@gnu.org> <87r11mr87m.fsf@gmail.com> <8335e2pt8c.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5390"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 57140@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 11 21:25:20 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oMDnz-00019H-6X for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 21:25:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50596 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oMDnx-0003zO-N6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 15:25:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36922) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oMDni-0003zA-Pk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 15:25:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37076) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oMDni-00036W-H5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 15:25:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oMDni-0007lu-AC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 15:25:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Tyler Grinn Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 19:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57140 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 57140-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57140.166024588429846 (code B ref 57140); Thu, 11 Aug 2022 19:25:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 57140) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Aug 2022 19:24:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55058 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oMDnP-0007lK-Mk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 15:24:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-il1-f180.google.com ([209.85.166.180]:39516) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oMDnN-0007l7-OD for 57140@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 15:24:43 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-il1-f180.google.com with SMTP id j20so10471720ila.6 for <57140@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 12:24:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc; bh=yss50aTJOwlr9YibkXOEwBJGfznQQynDmhlDARWeuIg=; b=dp6FsF+GcixKZdVpmZwc0RkwM6d3n/gFkBYAd9d+c5pA5tuvckMdqSYrqigkJvlSoN nEIOGcEI9+pLITxEsgImmxqgXz7UM1ghBx2LIBVsrwgeVt2HCh2v/w9eaMkzJoDZzA6t fNO7rDSt/sJ86T1bNB8KCDm7ayloFwz5ZcoioJKLAXtkoAwryowVEeYQxI+78bxndbMr 0kbzITh2Tnf83BXuBPI5yJxYGofUOHfs1Ge6rtsRD1EgTNMsrVzBnRaRzeMjgB5wRwv5 MeCDA/8EtJMm/9xGyPcyihpHHkKftim4elp1fpVUiW0CgrlFN/WKwJ9vbX1XtGUAhnAv 5D7A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=yss50aTJOwlr9YibkXOEwBJGfznQQynDmhlDARWeuIg=; b=W1d37sCo7J/5ugVMt+hjPCAWP4hNNRCJHwCvY3RcNn1tJNfPREzcSt3h81H5dKOlBC G99DXavrogb1TYDb+xbLg+D1R03Nzuaxjy918gG9j+NVwRv0Vdy8G5k3PJMJhpQdG51R zWS2Eq4Cjt+UIT7TiLf5e4Qb3IxX4bybX0n1pnKZ4K+ddpuXICHLa8taf27xKWdZTM53 oAa1W+qcCk1b8EQ+gG/Ru0ysH1QJp8MQSNrGW6RUk0JN6g+aDAOS1ltFC1xKQU/ShTwv GuRXl26/icZUSCN8/RKzGuv9+yTCG9O/FAWU3t1aD+oScFv/CHEWnNzNaXye55MrsDfv y+kg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2rdK3Bgtu+1A8PnlAowPOWcRqqM3xQuHtzWBDADCJ6BadcAMiD pq8rainRhEd0xUSiNEp35gPa+42e+ACHHA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR5PEaKM6cV82KsuZ5e3g3Z8GCW5xFeRkVT5BJAsD1C+G2iWphCzFZ9wVZKZGXzz3UR8VE2/og== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:509:b0:2de:7215:a6fa with SMTP id d9-20020a056e02050900b002de7215a6famr306950ils.318.1660245875467; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 12:24:35 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from tyler-fedora ([107.181.195.249]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y27-20020a02731b000000b003427170b558sm137997jab.57.2022.08.11.12.24.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 11 Aug 2022 12:24:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8335e2pt8c.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 11 Aug 2022 20:47:47 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:239371 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Tyler Grinn >> Cc: 57140@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 13:38:53 -0400 >> >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> >> Sure, let me rephrase: for two-finger scrolling, it's hard to emit a >> >> single scroll event. With a smaller step size it is easier to get it >> >> close to the scale I want, but regardless of the step size, choosing an >> >> exact text scale is difficult. This leads to buffers having slightly >> >> different text scales. >> > >> > If that's the problem, shouldn't that be handled by techniques we use >> > in precision-scrolling? >> >> Could you expand on that? > > Are you familiar with pixel-scroll-precision-mode? Yes, but it's unclear which techniques you're referring to, or what is lacking from the proposed behavior.