From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#51490: Show an indicator when Emacs is busy somewhere in the Emacs window Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 17:06:05 +0200 Message-ID: <87k05u5dwi.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87a6iqr8il.fsf@gnus.org> <87r107nmq7.fsf@gnus.org> <83y1uewa55.fsf@gnu.org> <87fsgl7zri.fsf@gnus.org> <83illhueuo.fsf@gnu.org> <87wn9x543a.fsf@gnus.org> <83bkr8vpwy.fsf@gnu.org> <87bkr8am4o.fsf@gnus.org> <834jx0vnam.fsf@gnu.org> <2d1b683c22a3585f038d@heytings.org> <83sfkku29t.fsf@gnu.org> <2d1b683c22d98c9cabd3@heytings.org> <83edw3udmh.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmfn7k7i.fsf@gnus.org> <83fsgjsi55.fsf@gnu.org> <831qs3sdz6.fsf@gnu.org> <83zgerqt1l.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23366"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Gregory Heytings , stefan@marxist.se, 51490@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 23 17:07:17 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1obkGq-0005pc-6S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 17:07:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54380 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1obkGp-0001yD-9N for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 11:07:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36600) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1obkGd-0001su-Fe for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 11:07:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42316) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1obkGd-0003Pi-78 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 11:07:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1obkGb-0002VU-Nm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 11:07:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 15:07:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51490 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 51490-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51490.16639455779577 (code B ref 51490); Fri, 23 Sep 2022 15:07:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 51490) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Sep 2022 15:06:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41394 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1obkFt-0002UP-6d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 11:06:17 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:37762) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1obkFr-0002UC-5E for 51490@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 11:06:15 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=9/8alEGIwsIDa+1IaHRSvA6cvKAy9Gg9ww/Q0bFjxow=; b=fIsbfm3mvq08Y+l/tf6sJfgL4Z 7whusgQZmN/0V90egaJRk+h1Rl3nzL39rf67Fsro8fKkcOffVLLYMNCTsmJA9jVfuyP66SjJyEArb V8pcicUKguB2W+HkmhIgRoYo5a9GQ8eQqNy+bW94eVNJczYfjmMKabp+kJgUQXRKbee4=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=joga) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1obkFi-0002zT-4T; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 17:06:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83zgerqt1l.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 22 Sep 2022 19:21:10 +0300") Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAElBMVEVgGSeyTzTtni/s qkX80Vn///8TRdHCAAAAAWJLR0QF+G/pxwAAAAd0SU1FB+YJFw41Kr8DeQIAAAG9SURBVDjLlZPb ecMgDIUhXcDCGaAIBiiIBWy8/0w9EthO0qfqAX/Wz9EFhHPvRpxCJKLFef3cVlYJBeuPewjXmI/T Sqoka1VQmZkuUtZaAMIEHE4gJKIxALgBXMF2KhE5SMEh9ZbAHWMxkPaj3xLsDjWU+uN8lkPTrFPS dOkb+sjp0PR0pu/QEDnnOe/8mn6jSgZoJQX8vEAx4LDyaytbuIGR+KnwJ2hX8gFUEs7sPd8KlVxg z0eXD0BaFmfrfoBZV9DerbYPQABl8Vi3J9UPgGsOraPlV0VcO+v9J47uHaACWjyFvL0D1rEBIJZF qrtbt+kZu9qx3yD6qXcLkez3kVgKML/4wAZmpAhC5OHAePR9+A3QqtW6xT3aBewMfd5Jw7rnISfg MQ17BHGuNZF+na3OT2SrCn4pBswfU4t4FbAnBAaGgHCz/A3/2jHVCpivIemL1iRN0g3GvOGsWj+Q I2o7QyA6OTk2Mf8FkBoAo2X78W9An4e0Oenw1wnwpSRj3MT2s1b1qIKTHf4uCfvrVFT4mwIxS8ly ark6GDJN31YaobxwOt0W3mrBWX6dL0z3Q2GhIs2L+mOL+7/9Akkpkqnkksl9AAAAJXRFWHRkYXRl OmNyZWF0ZQAyMDIyLTA5LTIzVDE0OjUzOjQyKzAwOjAw1XiV6AAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTptb2RpZnkA MjAyMi0wOS0yM1QxNDo1Mzo0MiswMDowMKQlLVQAAAAASUVORK5CYII= X-Now-Playing: Kate Bush's _The Kick Inside_: "Wuthering Heights" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:243466 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > It should be possible, yes. I just said that we don't have such an > infrastructure yet, it needs to be written first. When someone does > write it, they will have to deal with the issue of what kind of > drawing do we allow there; for example, a 1-pixel line is easy, but is > unlikely to be visually appealing. The spinner will presumably not be done with line drawing, but consist of a set of 8 glyphs that are defined along the lines of fringe markers. > And the main problem this will have to solve is this: whatever you > draw behind the back of the display engine will run the risk of being > wiped out when the next redisplay cycle kicks in. Yes, we'd have to have a way to tell the redisplay to lay off redrawing in that rectangle, probably.