From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#61730: 30.0.50; Compiler warnings for delq and delete Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2023 13:34:51 +0100 Message-ID: <87k005gbys.fsf@web.de> References: <87ilfsisje.fsf@web.de> <670D8E4A-333D-4E2D-97CC-86728965989D@gmail.com> <83a613np4p.fsf@gnu.org> <87fsavf688.fsf@web.de> <83k006kvv6.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7903"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: mattias.engdegard@gmail.com, 61730@debbugs.gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 25 13:36:18 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pVtmi-0001ox-Tb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2023 13:36:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pVtmX-0000pB-4k; Sat, 25 Feb 2023 07:36:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pVtmV-0000o8-DO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2023 07:36:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pVtmV-0007GJ-57 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2023 07:36:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pVtmU-0005s1-KK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2023 07:36:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2023 12:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61730 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 61730-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61730.167732851122483 (code B ref 61730); Sat, 25 Feb 2023 12:36:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 61730) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2023 12:35:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39322 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pVtlf-0005qX-BP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2023 07:35:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([217.72.192.78]:43915) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pVtlc-0005qE-TO for 61730@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2023 07:35:09 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=s29768273; t=1677328495; i=michael_heerdegen@web.de; bh=0g0o2J9Ajzfs+jKSyKEws1PhgBUKMjgqx8Chzh08rIc=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=e2onqjHQCSH+ngSsvGSl+O8C9q7hIIKmkjM3WVPHwXnYDHq4wRW19nq0t8ck8jXsP jHf7ATsQv5D7GOs+VcHCFT2AZtYU9xbfwlu2Ju3uEhjyiF1tuLNH71lUowWzC+uhmK /YI7nepyhlq5gPnfP/6yJdmiqpiEFDVP3zmj/DHgYks+rNqZ5lULU19h2Bz7sh2vS4 WMhrvi08lPGNzEhlLLaJTALLr8XPNe6JNSZeyl3TdHsw9PU7G37qyf2l/zMd4i8MsG KplAMQBkIeGE5/7zyBYwA9bXxEeaZUABkmUfx362eLDGq3J7x+CYoIxlY7oJaVrusU qRRR9avRCP1kg== X-UI-Sender-Class: 814a7b36-bfc1-4dae-8640-3722d8ec6cd6 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([84.59.210.57]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb106 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M604f-1pP3LB3lAB-007Ln8; Sat, 25 Feb 2023 13:34:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83k006kvv6.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 25 Feb 2023 10:11:25 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:w9YoKvdPA1KiQtfPb8Nsp6pAvikTGAi9fVI9WiVy09Qcvbqn82r zd6NBmHvln1QlWSsocbAs3NcKTFODQb7h2asKeuwv/R5IlWOjP9Ad0zjHF+6w/9ilcvg87t 0j0LQRj8Pph8L3xB8qi7fpprOnXXCVjDqF4P7+q4Hpqflo41JIdPkaiZDjIm1+UVR9Lo/jh nb4GoKpPbmVerTPPfZgNg== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:nkre6DuUZwg=;FfwKyI6pPSdvU08wLCq5ep/hLnZ qAbgpcKj078o5zD2udRk4YuA84PI7h4ZqtzlSztdY9NWbQaxXsIP6kSE3QOo/gr64OGS+aVoq QHSAPhTw1JCai2LMRjCHe4LB3Yn8ya2MlmKZ1wxLOLuCkk0UN9hFmZUjFMvihkEDlpU5HhwtJ mfDnPvUOEFJDRFjJ6vSmrGEiJbkimrWulolGCGaRY1wBthuVOB7xy6jXxB6vXxK40OgL1I/se v3RkDJkVYiG15P/yH1ql/FqCMQlPk+bc/ePUK2eFsM2LFwOt85dkNzet34tjlDdxJa5Xk3L9Z SiWkSGhi+D5SHv1hDqqP4SNd5Q2TjW5R16yGQOJd9W4d/Lyru8fKLAoYdlWzzT/oD5Egq5aSu r0zdOXSwAstzkxNTK71mhXBOvBw/pYBshgv77m+8XpmPuyPJMJzLJ90SVzMxWqYULPbcWNo0r 4nGIjSiSpLh+8WXc9H6eNBIjy2foY5qLGFP9Hav5PZaT/KDO0uXbG/4fg/K6E2Wh9mhpOjmTS yx/48qmPaUZxMs4K0pTJiabgZjHhtpEnynzFSn4ZG9Ud1Wj8mXeZ1XavbmB4hAuV8hinkB9uG aTQlxqmv8sxUzZ6g8gDOirNJSmdFwWrr1CVB0jPYq7o+zRRQcftwD7/8yevvjIwzmh9KKSXhW feUBWfP6JyuakzVfZ0y3l4ht9cz+ER088tPbrxgcs69bROA7QYkNzjXcBdcJ6xTdmwCq45RyD eEss/frE9Z9gcX/Tt0qVnTAVjQWhzOyEpL9+Mo9q6YEHkrCZe3ufojCxyp81+D71o4WpfvJw X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:256715 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > In Emacs maintenance and development, the two cases are actually one. > We rebuild Emacs so frequently that even a "rare" warning appears all > the time and is annoying. It is not a coincidence that we usually > don't tolerate warnings during the build of Emacs. What's your opinion about the case of non-destructive functions - is it ok if we would always warn about thrown away return values of calls of them? Michael.