From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#66187: read-file-name unexpected behavior when MUSTMATCH is a function Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2023 05:35:39 +0200 Message-ID: <87jzs33vqs.fsf@web.de> References: <87r0mni6m1.fsf@breatheoutbreathe.in> <87bkdq3nw6.fsf@web.de> <875y3yx221.fsf@breatheoutbreathe.in> <87pm260wh9.fsf@web.de> <87v8bx48ww.fsf@breatheoutbreathe.in> <87msx8sbpv.fsf@web.de> <87bkdoh1gy.fsf@breatheoutbreathe.in> <87h6ngs85e.fsf@web.de> <87ttr7nzyj.fsf@breatheoutbreathe.in> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14593"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: philipk@posteo.net, joseph@breatheoutbreathe.in To: 66187@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 04 05:37:03 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qnsh5-0003RO-Ct for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 04 Oct 2023 05:37:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qnsgr-0005Xc-4d; Tue, 03 Oct 2023 23:36:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qnsgn-0005XF-KP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2023 23:36:46 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qnsgn-0005HX-CX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2023 23:36:45 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qnsh4-00079B-SJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2023 23:37:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2023 03:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 66187 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-Debbugs-Original-To: Joseph Turner via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: philipk@posteo.net, 66187@debbugs.gnu.org, Joseph Turner Original-Received: via spool by 66187-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B66187.169639057127387 (code B ref 66187); Wed, 04 Oct 2023 03:37:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 66187) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Oct 2023 03:36:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41136 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qnsgE-00077e-Ue for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2023 23:36:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:59231) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qnsgC-00077E-7D for 66187@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2023 23:36:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=s29768273; t=1696390537; x=1696995337; i=michael_heerdegen@web.de; bh=5wIXguSeozyG9lnJyLHhv2YYK0MGV8znoZYz58FjJXM=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=DsQ1wJhFfH+ilvgen1SLToHaMPh6fJAtcC6J7D4gzmayLq9vX/4JI7d/R87EyUdsR7n5dnDsXEV m1K1rDq24g9E2deeQHiz1ViwmWdIhua9C/eG44EW73DukQVXEonpC+bhOf1nQ0yUYkI6n4twsT/ET gfanw2IS/wQsFWdXLgA0FVAaW4mx+QjbHg1ghv7Btwa3/twWfxT7urgk8IjvfZREiSqKOvm7MxkCA BnCdcJNxMqQF/3NKa7LG+8vNwrfOiMrEsCR6kZSyfGLYn1q34+r3ibKP/icaaAZvMCukK+hYpGp4c iWKhDP/14zdspC+g6YqozvfPQNS5zKCgg99w== X-UI-Sender-Class: 814a7b36-bfc1-4dae-8640-3722d8ec6cd6 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([88.66.201.191]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb106 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MPKB5-1qxxJ61N4H-00PP8j; Wed, 04 Oct 2023 05:35:37 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87ttr7nzyj.fsf@breatheoutbreathe.in> (Joseph Turner via's message of "Tue, 03 Oct 2023 14:18:42 -0700") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:KhtU4HPcEdB/JYGrvo/nJG4ghX82/M7R/vqp8gZlOryVuLgjPh1 2lTuEj/gx1hao4ltcMIOWTWcv0+2vLKvfMU3iVcGt5gDy+kk04DFe/scgwgmHvSeq31wpiS 0zadgn7DXsP9amyNXU4SCj0tTYPSTF96fuUIcm0UCOJh7FJxdog5l5300JFqAk1AdPtSt6D DHc2eaWEMgY4LYW5xL4fg== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:RVJE1qIUdCg=;XFHYPh2gLsZYeBluhwZQ1Mqgvfp JlDkkVG6J73tvcfKtOS16mCg9OBfr/7rDo45KHQ2MuVZPvsv589YfLOJv7yhUDHx2dJf8Pr9h zJPzDuLDrmpGyqWF+cVKsdoFDsTU1JGlpYuUbk/Az4kcOEnzDwO2y73k4XE/ptjbJJnEKDzJa wIFcj8Xe1TLdHTJZCMJfKS2IsJf8A87qXr/VpuyyKdTvQODTQXwzLHMkgVuuDtLVDID+mkiOi 5LNVTphGXVs5qp2ImuYkFp6kmZUuGl9vUqpHh77PJrKMTeagMqjBuS7fTM/YLrekjezkUfIAo jR/XqHwA3OVGpzWEWXFr/obBx+f2MK6C+yp7wUcBSyrh0S6A0ixTwdF+nuhwU+yPvClDMT9Gm IpFZpw3C61sZX5QRv0NOzRUDAoOWyy7OOu+COmkjRqOIPjMW+5yMaCRWoMx1eyAw1+rUZYyKu ln86UrLwE7cbK1A4Q7GBl58nVVeWDX0/VAVLvsLdbH+J+AEDYWy5iOAUn/XzR7NPxYkhXoO6I K4O7MsWV/2iGIeNWaa74ydNQH5kYH+L0fTCVEkSCmTBnxxZgU7byEqzdB11ZHNECyRnYpGFEp 85u4ZdPrMuLd+QAa1et8yzlI5LL3HZjTHyXQXIrg7P6x4HF2YoI6tsVXHbEVPF6g26zmyvkfk /9/uwQa83fF+RQm8CG15bjh43rduxaIsNkXS8JAkON1yMmUyedO0cjkb1SJl50r1vm+RLdLb5 008UspMEewD/9nzS+dFy+jligzgM98BWgW9N7SC+gkh//YTunsF/U0yakdugrKvflpB81HyG X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:271754 Archived-At: Joseph Turner via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" writes: > Since completing-read is such a fundamental part of Emacs, I doubt it > will be possible to change this behavior. This is only about `read-file-name' - and MUST-MATCH being allowed to be a function is quite new (June 2022). If we have good reasons to change the behavior because we find that the case when both MUST-MATCH and PREDICATE are specified does not work intuitively I think it would still be possible to tune it a bit. But we have to know which behavior is more expected than what we currently have. Michael.