From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1524: 23.0.60; gs.el - This code is experimental. Don't use it. Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 18:51:24 -0500 Message-ID: <87iqps29hf.fsf__8562.06533867425$1228867568$gmane$org@cyd.mit.edu> Reply-To: Chong Yidong , 1524@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1228867495 2485 80.91.229.12 (10 Dec 2008 00:04:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:04:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 1524@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, Leo To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 10 01:05:57 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LACaC-000308-9P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 01:05:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60355 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LACZ0-0002D9-GA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:04:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LACYw-0002BY-EG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:04:22 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LACYu-00029S-VE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:04:22 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40264 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LACYu-00029J-Nr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:04:20 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:45318) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LACYu-0002db-2K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:04:20 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mBA04HHQ028402; Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:04:17 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id mBA003rs027093; Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:00:03 -0800 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Chong Yidong Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:00:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 1524 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 1524-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1524.122886668325616 (code B ref 1524); Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:00:03 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 10; hammy, 46; neutral, 40; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--23060, 0.000-+--23.0.60, 0.000-+--H*M:fsf, 0.000-+--H*MI:fsf, 0.000-+--UD:el Original-Received: (at 1524) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 9 Dec 2008 23:51:23 +0000 Original-Received: from cyd.mit.edu (CYD.MIT.EDU [18.115.2.24]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mB9NpKP0025603 for <1524@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:51:21 -0800 Original-Received: by cyd.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CBBD657E09E; Tue, 9 Dec 2008 18:51:24 -0500 (EST) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:04:22 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:23111 Archived-At: > I really have no idea what gs.el does. The code looks sketchy leading me > to believe the comment in its header actually is true. > > This code is experimental. Don't use it. Looks like cruft to me too. Does anyone object to removing this file?